Cited by 7HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHIV/AIDS Impact and ResponsesPoverty, Education, and Child Welfare

A stepped-wedge randomised trial on the impact of early ART initiation on HIV-patients’ economic outcomes in eswatini

Open access
Steinert, Janina Isabel, Khan, Shaukat, Mlambo, Khudzie, Walsh, Fiona J, Mafara, Emma, Lejeune, Charlotte, Wong, Cebele, Hettema, Anita +7 more·2020·eLife

Abstract

Background: Since 2015, the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends immediate initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for all HIV-positive patients. Epidemiological evidence points to important health benefits of immediate ART initiation; however, the policy’s impact on the economic aspects of patients' lives remains unknown. Methods: We conducted a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial in Eswatini to determine the causal impact of immediate ART initiation on patients’ individual- and household-level economic outcomes. Fourteen healthcare facilities were non-randomly matched into pairs and then randomly allocated to transition from the standard of care (ART eligibility at CD4 counts of <350 cells/mm3 until September 2016 and <500 cells/mm3 thereafter) to the ‘Early Initiation of ART for All’ (EAAA) intervention at one of seven timepoints. Patients, healthcare personnel, and outcome assessors remained unblinded. Data were collected via standardised paper-based surveys with HIV-positive adults who were neither pregnant nor breastfeeding. Outcomes were patients’ time use, employment status, household expenditures, and household living standards. Results: A total sample of 3019 participants were interviewed over the duration of the study. The mean number of participants approached at each facility per time step varied from 4 to 112 participants. Using mixed-effects negative binomial regressions accounting for time trends and clustering at the level of the healthcare facility, we found no significant difference between study arms for any economic outcome. Specifically, the EAAA intervention had no significant effect on non-resting time use (RR = 1.00 [CI: 0.96, 1.05, p=0.93]) or income-generating time use (RR = 0.94, [CI: 0.73,1.20, p=0.61]). Employment and household expenditures decreased slightly but not significantly in the EAAA group, with risk ratios of 0.93 [CI: 0.82, 1.04, p=0.21] and 0.92 [CI: 0.79, 1.06, p=0.26], respectively. We also found no significant treatment effect on households’ asset ownership and living standards (RR = 0.96, [CI 0.92, 1.00, p=0.253]). Lastly, there was no evidence of heterogeneity in effect estimates by patients’ sex, age, education, timing of HIV diagnosis and ART initiation. Conclusions: Our findings do not provide evidence that should discourage further investments into scaling up immediate ART for all HIV patients. Funding: Funded by the Dutch Postcode Lottery in the Netherlands, Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung (Humboldt-Stiftung), the Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in South Africa/Mozambique, British Columbia Centre of Excellence in Canada, Doctors Without Borders (MSF USA), National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health and Joachim Herz Foundation. Clinical trial number: NCT02909218 and NCT03789448 .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.58487

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steinert, J. I., Khan, S., Mlambo, K., Walsh, F. J., Mafara, E., Lejeune, C., Wong, C., Hettema, A., Ogbuoji, O., Vollmer, S., De Neve, J.-W., Mazibuko, S., Okello, V., Bärnighausen, T., & Geldsetzer, P.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Clinton Health Access Initiative (US)
  • Clinton Health Acccess Initiative, Boston, United States
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
  • Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Ministry of Health (SZ)
Corresponding author
Steinert, Janina Isabel
Venue
eLife
Published
2020-08-24
Volume
9
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3080933331
Cited by
7
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Dutch Postcode Lottery in the Netherlands
  • Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
  • The Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in South Africa/Mozambique
  • British Columbia Centre of Excellence in Canada
  • Doctors Without Borders
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (Award Number KL2TR003143)
  • Joachim Herz Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Keywords
early antiretroviral therapy initiation, HIV, economic outcomes, household expenditure, employment status, time use, household living standards, household asset ownership, WHO treatment guidelines, Swaziland
MeSH terms
Economic Status, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Employment, Female, Health Facilities, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Eswatini, HIV Infections, Anti-HIV Agents, Young Adult, Time-to-Treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review