Cited by 87Cellular transport and secretionEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress and DiseaseRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

Structural and mechanistic basis of the EMC-dependent biogenesis of distinct transmembrane clients

Open access
Miller-Vedam, Lakshmi E, Bräuning, Bastian, Popova, Katerina D, Schirle Oakdale, Nicole T, Bonnar, Jessica L, Prabu, Jesuraj R, Boydston, Elizabeth A, Sevillano, Natalia +6 more·2020·eLife

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Membrane protein biogenesis in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is complex and failure-prone. The ER membrane protein complex (EMC), comprising eight conserved subunits, has emerged as a central player in this process. Yet, we have limited understanding of how EMC enables insertion and integrity of diverse clients, from tail-anchored to polytopic transmembrane proteins. Here, yeast and human EMC cryo-EM structures reveal conserved intricate assemblies and human-specific features associated with pathologies. Structure-based functional studies distinguish between two separable EMC activities, as an insertase regulating tail-anchored protein levels and a broader role in polytopic membrane protein biogenesis. These depend on mechanistically coupled yet spatially distinct regions including two lipid-accessible membrane cavities which confer client-specific regulation, and a non-insertase EMC function mediated by the EMC lumenal domain. Our studies illuminate the structural and mechanistic basis of EMC’s multifunctionality and point to its role in differentially regulating the biogenesis of distinct client protein classes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.62611

Cites

128 of 128 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

20 of the 148 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller-Vedam, L. E., Bräuning, B., Popova, K. D., Schirle Oakdale, N. T., Bonnar, J. L., Prabu, J. R., Boydston, E. A., Sevillano, N., Shurtleff, M. J., Stroud, R. M., Craik, C. S., Schulman, B. A., Frost, A., & Weissman, J. S.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry (DE)
  • Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Schulman, Brenda A
  • Frost, Adam
  • Weissman, Jonathan S
Venue
eLife
Published
2020-11-25
Volume
9
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3110296556
Cited by
87
References
148
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 2
FWCI
6.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Leibniz Prize SCHU 3196/1-1)
  • Max Planck Society
  • National Institutes of Health (P50AI150476, 1P41CA196276-01, 1DP2OD017690-01, GM24485)
  • Helen Hay Whitney Foundation
  • Peter und Traudl Engelhorn Stiftung
  • Jane Coffin Childs Memorial Fund for Medical Research
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (55108523)
  • Chan Zuckerberg Initiative
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
electromagnetic compatibility, membrane protein biogenesis, endoplasmic reticulum, tail-anchored proteins, polytopic membrane proteins, protein insertion
MeSH terms
Endoplasmic Reticulum, Humans, Intracellular Membranes, Membrane Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Blotting, Western, Sequence Alignment, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review