The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A novel bioinformatics pipeline for the identification of immune inhibitory receptors as potential therapeutic targets
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Despite major successes with inhibitory receptor blockade in cancer, the identification of novel inhibitory receptors as putative drug targets is needed due to lack of durable responses, therapy resistance, and side effects. Most inhibitory receptors signal via immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motifs (ITIMs) and previous studies estimated that our genome contains over 1600 ITIM-bearing transmembrane proteins. However, testing and development of these candidates requires increased understanding of their expression patterns and likelihood to function as inhibitory receptor. Therefore, we designed a novel bioinformatics pipeline integrating machine learning-guided structural predictions and sequence-based likelihood models to identify putative inhibitory receptors. Using transcriptomics data of immune cells, we determined the expression of these novel inhibitory receptors, and classified them into previously proposed functional categories. Known and putative inhibitory receptors were expressed across different immune cell subsets with cell type-specific expression patterns. Furthermore, putative immune inhibitory receptors were differentially expressed in subsets of tumour infiltrating T cells. In conclusion, we present an inhibitory receptor pipeline that identifies 51 known and 390 novel human inhibitory receptors. This pipeline will support future drug target selection across diseases where therapeutic targeting of immune inhibitory receptors is warranted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome
Tunyasuvunakool, K., Adler, J., Wu, Z., Green, T., Zielinski, M., Žídek, A., Bridgland, A., Cowie, A., Meyer, C., Laydon, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · Cited by 3,025
Pan-cancer single-cell landscape of tumor-infiltrating T cells
Zheng, L., Qin, S., Si, W., Wang, A., Xing, B., Gao, R., Ren, X., Wang, L., Wu, X., Zhang, J., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abe6474 · Cited by 1,402
TIM3 comes of age as an inhibitory receptor
Wolf, Y., Anderson, A. C., & Kuchroo, V. K. (2020) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-019-0224-6 · Cited by 959
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 49
- AkashdipSingh. 2023. IIR_pipeline. Software Heritage. swh:1:rev:989cfba460c3672f133fcbb1d800bd45bd02dae3. https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:dir:e73c060824474aaef3203dcc379d51fcc4fa11e2;origin=https://github.com/AkashdipSingh/IIR_pipeline;visit=swh:1:snp:e53fbf602826766bc73b479a6befe8439ef9e260;anchor=swh:1:rev:989cfba460c3672f133fcbb1d800bd45bd02dae3.
- Andrews, 2019, Inhibitory receptors and ligands beyond PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4: breakthroughs or backups, Nature Immunology, 20, 1425, 10.1038/s41590-019-0512-0 · DOI
- Barrow, 2006, You say ITAM and I say ITIM, let’s call the whole thing off: the ambiguity of immunoreceptor signalling, European Journal of Immunology, 36, 1646, 10.1002/eji.200636195 · DOI
- Békés, 2022, PROTAC targeted protein degraders: the past is prologue, Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery, 21, 181, 10.1038/s41573-021-00371-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Calderon, 2019, Landscape of stimulation-responsive chromatin across diverse human immune cells, Nature Genetics, 51, 1494, 10.1038/s41588-019-0505-9 · DOI
- Chemnitz, 2004, SHP-1 and SHP-2 associate with immunoreceptor tyrosine-based switch motif of programmed death 1 upon primary human T cell stimulation, but only receptor ligation prevents T cell activation, Journal of Immunology, 173, 945, 10.4049/jimmunol.173.2.945 · DOI · Paper page
- Chocarro, 2022, Cutting-edge: Preclinical and clinical development of the first approved lag-3 inhibitor, Cells, 11, 10.3390/cells11152351 · DOI
- Cunningham, 2022, Ensembl 2022, Nucleic Acids Research, 50, D988, 10.1093/nar/gkab1049 · DOI · Paper page
- Daëron, 2008, Immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motifs: a quest in the past and future, Immunological Reviews, 224, 11, 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00666.x · DOI
- de Vet, 2001, G6b, a novel immunoglobulin superfamily member encoded in the human major histocompatibility complex, interacts with SHP-1 and SHP-2, Journal of Biological Chemistry, 276, 42070, 10.1074/jbc.M103214200 · DOI
- Dietrich, 2001, Ig-like transcript 2 (ILT2)/leukocyte Ig-like receptor 1 (LIR1) inhibits TCR signaling and actin cytoskeleton reorganization, Journal of Immunology, 166, 2514, 10.4049/jimmunol.166.4.2514 · DOI
- Durinck, 2009, Mapping identifiers for the integration of genomic datasets with the R/Bioconductor package biomaRt, Nature Protocols, 4, 1184, 10.1038/nprot.2009.97 · DOI
- Ferjoux, 2003, Critical role of Src and SHP-2 in sst2 somatostatin receptor-mediated activation of SHP-1 and inhibition of cell proliferation, Molecular Biology of the Cell, 14, 3911, 10.1091/mbc.e03-02-0069 · DOI
- Gagolewski, 2022, stringi: Fast and portable character string processing in R, Journal of Statistical Software, 103, 1, 10.18637/jss.v103.i02 · DOI
- Gaur, 2008, Altered splicing of CEACAM1 in breast cancer: identification of regulatory sequences that control splicing of CEACAM1 into long or short cytoplasmic domain isoforms, Molecular Cancer, 7, 10.1186/1476-4598-7-46 · DOI
- Geerdink, 2018, LAIR-1 limits neutrophil extracellular trap formation in viral bronchiolitis, The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 141, 811, 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.08.031 · DOI
- Grant, 2021, The Bio3D packages for structural bioinformatics, Protein Science, 30, 20, 10.1002/pro.3923 · DOI
- Grebinoski, 2020, Inhibitory receptor agonists: the future of autoimmune disease therapeutics?, Current Opinion in Immunology, 67, 1, 10.1016/j.coi.2020.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
- Helfrich, 2019, Size matters: The functional role of the CEACAM1 isoform signature and its impact for NK cell-mediated killing in melanoma, Cancers, 11, 10.3390/cancers11030356 · DOI
- Jakob, 2014, Conditionally and transiently disordered proteins: awakening cryptic disorder to regulate protein function, Chemical Reviews, 114, 6779, 10.1021/cr400459c · DOI
- Karpisheh, 2022, The role of Th17 cells in the pathogenesis and treatment of breast cancer, Cancer Cell International, 22, 10.1186/s12935-022-02528-8 · DOI
- Kiefhaber, 2012, Dynamics and mechanisms of coupled protein folding and binding reactions, Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 22, 21, 10.1016/j.sbi.2011.09.010 · DOI
- Long, 1999, Regulation of immune responses through inhibitory receptors, Annual Review of Immunology, 17, 875, 10.1146/annurev.immunol.17.1.875 · DOI
- Love, 2014, Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2, Genome Biology, 15, 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Mirdita, 2022, ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all, Nature Methods, 19, 679, 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Möller, 2001, Evaluation of methods for the prediction of membrane spanning regions, Bioinformatics, 17, 646, 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.7.646 · DOI
- Ostrakhovitch, 2006, The role of SLAM family receptors in immune cell signaling, Biochemistry and Cell Biology = Biochimie et Biologie Cellulaire, 84, 832, 10.1139/o06-191 · DOI
- Reynolds, 2008, Transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction using dynamic bayesian networks, PLOS Computational Biology, 4, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000213 · DOI
- Rives, 2021, Biological structure and function emerge from scaling unsupervised learning to 250 million protein sequences, PNAS, 118, 10.1073/pnas.2016239118 · DOI · Paper page
- Rumpret, 2020, Functional categories of immune inhibitory receptors, Nature Reviews. Immunology, 20, 771, 10.1038/s41577-020-0352-z · DOI
- Schnell, 2020, The yin and yang of co-inhibitory receptors: toward anti-tumor immunity without autoimmunity, Cell Research, 30, 285, 10.1038/s41422-020-0277-x · DOI
- Seal, 2023, Genenames.org: the HGNC resources in 2023, Nucleic Acids Research, 51, D1003, 10.1093/nar/gkac888 · DOI
- Sharma, 2017, Primary, adaptive, and acquired resistance to cancer immunotherapy, Cell, 168, 707, 10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.017 · DOI · Paper page
- Staub, 2004, Systematic identification of immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motifs in the human proteome, Cellular Signalling, 16, 435, 10.1016/j.cellsig.2003.08.013 · DOI
- Tay, 2021, Revisiting the role of CD4+ T cells in cancer immunotherapy-new insights into old paradigms, Cancer Gene Therapy, 28, 5, 10.1038/s41417-020-0183-x · DOI
- Timmerman, 2021, Identification of a novel conserved signaling motif in CD200 receptor required for its inhibitory function, PLOS ONE, 16, 10.1371/journal.pone.0244770 · DOI
- Tompa, 2014, A million peptide motifs for the molecular biologist, Molecular Cell, 55, 161, 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.05.032 · DOI
- Tsirigos, 2015, The TOPCONS web server for consensus prediction of membrane protein topology and signal peptides, Nucleic Acids Research, 43, W401, 10.1093/nar/gkv485 · DOI
- Tsirigos, 2018, Topology of membrane proteins-predictions, limitations and variations, Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 50, 9, 10.1016/j.sbi.2017.10.003 · DOI
- Varadi, 2022, AlphaFold Protein Structure Database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models, Nucleic Acids Research, 50, D439, 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · DOI · Paper page
- Voisin, 2008, A hallmark of immunoreceptor, the tyrosine-based inhibitory motif ITIM, is present in the G protein-coupled receptor OX1R for orexins and drives apoptosis: A novel mechanism, FASEB Journal, 22, 1993, 10.1096/fj.07-098723 · DOI
- Voisinne, 2018, CD5, an Undercover Regulator of TCR Signaling, Frontiers in Immunology, 9, 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02900 · DOI
- von Richthofen, 2023, Sensing context: Inhibitory receptors on non-hematopoietic cells, European Journal of Immunology, 53, 10.1002/eji.202250306 · DOI
- West, 2016, A TSLP-complement axis mediates neutrophil killing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Science Immunology, 1, 10.1126/sciimmunol.aaf8471 · DOI
- Wolchok, 2013, Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma, The New England Journal of Medicine, 369, 122, 10.1056/NEJMoa1302369 · DOI · Paper page
- Zhai, 2021, Immune checkpoints, a novel class of therapeutic targets for autoimmune diseases, Frontiers in Immunology, 12, 10.3389/fimmu.2021.645699 · DOI
- Zheng L, Qin S, Si W, Wang A, Xing B, Gao R, Ren X, Wang L, Wu X, Zhang J, Wu N, Zhang N, Zheng H, Ouyang H, Chen K, Bu Z, Hu X, Ji J, Zhang Z. 2021. Pan-Cancer Single Cell Landscape of Tumor-Infiltrating T Cells. NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE156728. GSE156728.
- West EE, Spolski R, Kazemian M, Zx Yu, Kemper C, Leonard WJ. 2016. TSLP acts on neutrophils to drive complement-mediated killing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE73313. GSE73313.
- Calderon D, Nguyen ML, Mezger A. 2019. RNA-seq data. NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE118165. GSE118165.
Metadata
- Authors
- Singh, A., Miranda Bedate, A., von Richthofen, H. J., Vijver, S. V., van der Vlist, M., Kuhn, R., Yermanos, A., Kuball, J. J., Kesmir, C., Pascoal Ramos, M. I., & Meyaard, L.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Theoretical Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Biology, Utrecht University
- Corresponding author
- Meyaard, Linde
- ORCID
- Venue
- eLife
- Publisher
- eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
- Published
- 2024-10-08
- Volume
- 13
- ISSN
- 2050-084X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4403217777
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 1.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- ETH Zürich Research Collection
- Funders
- Oncode Institute
- KWF Kankerbestrijding (2021-14339)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Cell Function and Interaction
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Keywords
- immune inhibitory receptors, ITIM, drug target identification, machine learning prediction, structure prediction, transcriptomics, tumor-infiltrating T cells, cancer immunotherapy, treatment resistance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review