Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2,438

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?: Thinking from Women's Lives

Harding, Sandra·2016·Cornell University Press eBooks
DOI 10.7591/9781501712951
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Introduction - after the question in feminism. Part 1 Science: feminism confronts the sciences how the women's movement benefits - two views why physics is a bad model for physics. Part 2 Epistemology: what is feminist epistemology strong objectivity and socially situated knowledge feminist epistemology in and after the enlightenment. Part 3 Others: ...and race? - the question in global feminism common histories, common destinies - in the first and third worlds real science thinking from the perspective of lesbian lives reinventing ourselves as other Conclusion - what is a feminist science.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7591/9781501712951

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Harding, S.
Venue
Cornell University Press eBooks
Publisher
Cornell University Press
Published
2016-12-01
DOI
10.7591/9781501712951
OpenAlex
W2078186038
Cited by
2,438
References
0
FWCI
89.43
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.