Cited by 42Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementAI in cancer detectionMedicine and Dermatology Studies History

An approach to the dermatological classification of histopathological skin images using a hybridized CNN-DenseNet model

Open access
De, Anubhav, Mishra, Nilamadhab, Chang, Hsien-Tsung·2024·PeerJ Computer Science

Abstract

This research addresses the challenge of automating skin disease diagnosis using dermatoscopic images. The primary issue lies in accurately classifying pigmented skin lesions, which traditionally rely on manual assessment by dermatologists and are prone to subjectivity and time consumption. By integrating a hybrid CNN-DenseNet model, this study aimed to overcome the complexities of differentiating various skin diseases and automating the diagnostic process effectively. Our methodology involved rigorous data preprocessing, exploratory data analysis, normalization, and label encoding. Techniques such as model hybridization, batch normalization and data fitting were employed to optimize the model architecture and data fitting. Initial iterations of our convolutional neural network (CNN) model achieved an accuracy of 76.22% on the test data and 75.69% on the validation data. Recognizing the need for improvement, the model was hybridized with DenseNet architecture and ResNet architecture was implemented for feature extraction and then further trained on the HAM10000 and PAD-UFES-20 datasets. Overall, our efforts resulted in a hybrid model that demonstrated an impressive accuracy of 95.7% on the HAM10000 dataset and 91.07% on the PAD-UFES-20 dataset. In comparison to recently published works, our model stands out because of its potential to effectively diagnose skin diseases such as melanocytic nevi, melanoma, benign keratosis-like lesions, basal cell carcinoma, actinic keratoses, vascular lesions, and dermatofibroma, all of which rival the diagnostic accuracy of real-world clinical specialists but also offer customization potential for more nuanced clinical uses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7717/peerj-cs.1884

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using AI-based models can help doctors find diseases faster and more correctly, improve patient care, and make healthcare systems less busy.

    “using AI-based models can help doctors find diseases faster and more correctly, which can improve the care for patients and make healthcare systems less busy (18, 19).”

    From Revolutionizing dermatopathology using AI in skin diagnostics: scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Major highlights and Conclusion (page unavailable) say the model could accelerate skin-disease diagnosis and that accurate, efficient AI could assist clinicians and improve patient outcomes. The paper does not establish that AI makes healthcare systems less busy; it predicts reduced costs instead, and says clinical validation is still needed. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CNNs have been employed for histopathological slides and dermoscopic images for identifying skin lesions such as melanoma, basal cell carcinoma, psoriasis, and other inflammatory skin diseases.

    “CNNs have been employed for histopathological slides and dermoscopic images for identifying several skin lesions such as melanoma, basal cell carcinoma, psoriasis, and other inflammatory skin diseases.”

    From Revolutionizing dermatopathology using AI in skin diagnostics: scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Introduction says CNNs can classify skin diseases from dermatoscopic images, and the Major highlights name melanoma and basal cell carcinoma among the model’s target lesions. Related Works mentions deep-learning classification of histopathological images, but the paper’s own dataset consists of dermatoscopic images. The passages do not support the claim’s specific inclusion of psoriasis or other inflammatory skin diseases. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De, A., Mishra, N., & Chang, H.-T.
Affiliations
  • VIT Bhopal University (IN)
  • Chang Gung University (TW)
Corresponding author
Chang, Hsien-Tsung
Venue
PeerJ Computer Science
Publisher
PeerJ
Published
2024-02-26
Volume
10
Pages
e1884
ISSN
2376-5992 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392160092
Cited by
42
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 4
FWCI
7.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PeerJ Computer Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • The National Science and Technology Council (111-2221-E-182-058, 112-2410-H-182-026-MY2)
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (NERPD4N0231, NERPD2M0231)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Medicine and Dermatology Studies History
Keywords
skin lesion classification, dermoscopic images, pigmented skin lesions, DenseNet, ResNet, melanoma, melanocytic nevi, basal cell carcinoma, actinic keratosis, dermatofibroma, HAM10000 dataset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review