The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
BinSanity: unsupervised clustering of environmental microbial assemblies using coverage and affinity propagation
Open accessAbstract
Metagenomics has become an integral part of defining microbial diversity in various environments. Many ecosystems have characteristically low biomass and few cultured representatives. Linking potential metabolisms to phylogeny in environmental microorganisms is important for interpreting microbial community functions and the impacts these communities have on geochemical cycles. However, with metagenomic studies there is the computational hurdle of ‘binning’ contigs into phylogenetically related units or putative genomes. Binning methods have been implemented with varying approaches such as k-means clustering, Gaussian mixture models, hierarchical clustering, neural networks, and two-way clustering; however, many of these suffer from biases against low coverage/abundance organisms and closely related taxa/strains. We are introducing a new binning method, BinSanity, that utilizes the clustering algorithm affinity propagation (AP), to cluster assemblies using coverage with compositional based refinement (tetranucleotide frequency and percent GC content) to optimize bins containing multiple source organisms. This separation of composition and coverage based clustering reduces bias for closely related taxa. BinSanity was developed and tested on artificial metagenomes varying in size and complexity. Results indicate that BinSanity has a higher precision, recall, and Adjusted Rand Index compared to five commonly implemented methods. When tested on a previously published environmental metagenome, BinSanity generated high completion and low redundancy bins corresponding with the published metagenome-assembled genomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P., & Tyson, G. W. (2015) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.186072.114 · Cited by 12,496
Hubert, L., & Arabie, P. (1985) · Journal of Classification · doi:10.1007/bf01908075 · Cited by 8,219
Evolutionary Implications of Microbial Genome Tetranucleotide Frequency Biases
Pride, D. T., Meinersmann, R. J., Wassenaar, T. M., & Blaser, M. J. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.335003 · Cited by 289
Cited by
Olm, M. R., Brown, C. T., Brooks, B., & Banfield, J. F. (2017) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2017.126 · Cited by 3,031
Recovery of genomes from metagenomes via a dereplication, aggregation and scoring strategy
(2017) · doi:10.1038/s41564-018-0171-1 · Cited by 1,742
The reconstruction of 2,631 draft metagenome-assembled genomes from the global oceans
Tully, B. J., Graham, E. D., & Heidelberg, J. F. (2018) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2017.203 · Cited by 508
Self-citationAlexander, H., Hu, S. K., Krinos, A. I., Pachiadaki, M., Tully, B. J., Neely, C. J., & Reiter, T. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.07.25.453713 · Cited by 67
Self-citationMetabolic strategies shared by basement residents of the lost City hydrothermal field
Brazelton, W. J., McGonigle, J. M., Motamedi, S., Pendleton, H. L., Twing, K. I., Miller, B. C., Lowe, W. J., Hoffman, A. M., Prator, C. A., Chadwick, G. L., et al. (2022) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00929-22 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Graham, E. D., Heidelberg, J. F., & Tully, B. J.
- Venue
- PeerJ
- Publisher
- PeerJ
- Published
- 2017-03-08
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- e3035
- ISSN
- 2167-8359 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2950489962
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BinSanity: unsupervised clustering of environmental microbial assemblies using coverage and affinity propagation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7717/peerj.3035
- The paper
- Graham, E. D., Heidelberg, J. F., & Tully, B. J. (2017). BinSanity: unsupervised clustering of environmental microbial assemblies using coverage and affinity propagation. PeerJ. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3035
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.