Cited by 10Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical ResearchMicrofluidic and Bio-sensing TechnologiesCell Image Analysis Techniques

QSpec: online control and data analysis system for single-cell Raman spectroscopy

Open access
Ren, Lihui, Su, Xiaoquan, Wang, Yun, Xu, Jian, Ning, Kang·2014·PeerJ

Abstract

Single-cell phenotyping is critical to the success of biological reductionism. Raman-activated cell sorting (RACS) has shown promise in resolving the dynamics of living cells at the individual level and to uncover population heterogeneities in comparison to established approaches such as fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). Given that the number of single-cells would be massive in any experiment, the power of Raman profiling technique for single-cell analysis would be fully utilized only when coupled with a high-throughput and intelligent process control and data analysis system. In this work, we established QSpec, an automatic system that supports high-throughput Raman-based single-cell phenotyping. Additionally, a single-cell Raman profile database has been established upon which data-mining could be applied to discover the heterogeneity among single-cells under different conditions. To test the effectiveness of this control and data analysis system, a sub-system was also developed to simulate the phenotypes of single-cells as well as the device features.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7717/peerj.436

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Databases of single-cell bacteria, yeast, and microalgae spectra can all be used together to improve prediction and classification models of microalgae.

    “Furthermore, databases of single-cell bacteria, yeast, and microalgae spectra can all be used together to improve prediction and classification models of microalgae [30].”

    From Microalgal process-monitoring based on high-selectivity spectroscopy tools: status and future perspectives (2018) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Results sections on the Raman profile database and profile comparison describe a database containing bacterial, yeast, and microalgal spectra and report classification of Nannochloropsis cells against it. They do not show that combining those groups improves microalgae prediction or classification models relative to using microalgal spectra alone. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Continued data collection of microalgae spectra into spectral databases can improve machine learning models (e.g. SVM) to become more robust and applied to MVPC.

    “Moreover, with continued data collection of microalgae spectra into spectral databases, machine learning models (e.g. SVM) can be improved to become more robust [30] and applied to MVPC.”

    From Microalgal process-monitoring based on high-selectivity spectroscopy tools: status and future perspectives (2018) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Results section, “Single-cell Raman profile comparison” (page unavailable), reports using SVM to search a Raman-spectra database that includes microalgae and finding higher accuracy than Euclidean Distance. It examines database size, but does not establish that continued collection makes SVM models more robust. The application to MVPC appears after the citation and is not treated as a claim attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ren, L., Su, X., Wang, Y., Xu, J., & Ning, K.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Ning, Kang
Venue
PeerJ
Publisher
PeerJ
Published
2014-06-26
Volume
2
Pages
e436
ISSN
2167-8359 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029022745
Cited by
10
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • PeerJ (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Institutional knowledge base (Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R34AA021502)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Keywords
single-cell Raman spectroscopy, single-cell phenotyping, online process control, high-throughput data analysis, cellular heterogeneity, data mining

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review