The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analyzing mixing systems using a new generation of Bayesian tracer mixing models
Open accessAbstract
The ongoing evolution of tracer mixing models has resulted in a confusing array of software tools that differ in terms of data inputs, model assumptions, and associated analytic products. Here we introduce MixSIAR, an inclusive, rich, and flexible Bayesian tracer (e.g., stable isotope) mixing model framework implemented as an open-source R package. Using MixSIAR as a foundation, we provide guidance for the implementation of mixing model analyses. We begin by outlining the practical differences between mixture data error structure formulations and relate these error structures to common mixing model study designs in ecology. Because Bayesian mixing models afford the option to specify informative priors on source proportion contributions, we outline methods for establishing prior distributions and discuss the influence of prior specification on model outputs. We also discuss the options available for source data inputs (raw data versus summary statistics) and provide guidance for combining sources. We then describe a key advantage of MixSIAR over previous mixing model software—the ability to include fixed and random effects as covariates explaining variability in mixture proportions and calculate relative support for multiple models via information criteria. We present a case study of Alligator mississippiensis diet partitioning to demonstrate the power of this approach. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of limitations to mixing model applications. Through MixSIAR, we have consolidated the disparate array of mixing model tools into a single platform, diversified the set of available parameterizations, and provided developers a platform upon which to continue improving mixing model analyses in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments
Hurlbert, S. H. (1984) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942661 · Cited by 8,377
(2015) · doi:10.1007/s11222-016-9696-4 · Cited by 5,611
JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling
Plummer, M. (2003) · Cited by 4,720
The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data
Aitchison, J. (1986) · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-4109-0 · Cited by 4,383
The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data
Piepel, G. F. (1988) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1988.10488337 · Cited by 3,418
Source Partitioning Using Stable Isotopes: Coping with Too Much Variation
Parnell, A. C., Inger, R., Bearhop, S., & Jackson, A. L. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009672 · Cited by 2,940
Self-citationSource partitioning using stable isotopes: coping with too many sources
Phillips, D. L., & Gregg, J. W. (2003) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-003-1218-3 · Cited by 2,079
Self-citationIncorporating uncertainty and prior information into stable isotope mixing models
Moore, J. W., & Semmens, B. X. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01163.x · Cited by 1,325
Self-citation
Cited by
Torres-Martínez, J. A., Mora, A., Knappett, P. S. K., Ornelas-Soto, N., & Mahlknecht, J. (2020) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2020.115962 · Cited by 382
Whelton, H. L., Hammann, S., Cramp, L. J. E., Dunne, J., Roffet-Salque, M., & Evershed, R. P. (2021) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2021.105397 · Cited by 132
Rode, K. D., Robbins, C. T., Stricker, C. A., Taras, B. D., & Tollefson, T. N. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94917-8 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Stock, B. C., Jackson, A. L., Ward, E. J., Parnell, A. C., Phillips, D. L., & Semmens, B. X.
- Venue
- PeerJ
- Publisher
- PeerJ
- Published
- 2018-06-21
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- e5096
- ISSN
- 2167-8359 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2799446353
- Cited by
- 1,524
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 55.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analyzing mixing systems using a new generation of Bayesian tracer mixing models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7717/peerj.5096
- The paper
- Stock, B. C., Jackson, A. L., Ward, E. J., Parnell, A. C., Phillips, D. L., & Semmens, B. X. (2018). Analyzing mixing systems using a new generation of Bayesian tracer mixing models. PeerJ. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5096
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.