Cited by 30Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationSchizophrenia research and treatmentArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

A case study demonstrating applications of ChatGPT in the clinical management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

Open access
Galido, Pearl Valentine, Butala, Saloni, Chakerian, Meg, Agustines, Davin·2023·Cureus

Abstract

Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer, also known as ChatGPT, is a new artificial intelligence (AI) program that responds to user inquiry with discourse resembling human language. The range of ChatGPT capabilities caught the interest of the medical world after it demonstrated its ability to pass medical boards examinations. In this case report, we present the clinical treatment of a 22-year-old male diagnosed with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) and compare the medical management suggested by ChatGPT to current standards of care in order to assess the program's ability to identify the disorder, evaluate potential medical and psychiatric work-up, and develop a treatment plan addressing the distinct nuances of our patient. In our inquiry with ChatGPT, we found that it can accurately identify our patient as having TRS and order appropriate tests to methodically rule out alternative causes of acute psychosis. Furthermore, the AI program suggests pharmacologic treatment options including clozapine with adjuvant medications, and nonpharmacologic treatment options including electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and psychotherapy which align with current standards of care. Lastly, ChatGPT provides a comprehensive list of side effects associated with antipsychotics and mood stabilizers used to treat TRS. We found both potential for and limitations in the clinical application of ChatGPT to assist in the assessment and management of complex medical conditions. Overall, ChatGPT may serve as a powerful tool to organize medical data in a meaningful and palatable format for medical professionals to reference during patient care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7759/cureus.38166

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To obtain desired and appropriate information from ChatGPT, users require a minimum clinical knowledge that novice clinicians and people from non-medical fields do not have.

    “These findings suggest, to obtain the desired and appropriate information from ChatGPT, users require a minimum clinical knowledge that novice clinicians and people from non-medical fields do not have.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [16]Psychosis Calabrese J Al Khalili Y Treasure Island (FL) StatPearls Publishing 2023 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31536188/

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Galido, P. V., Butala, S., Chakerian, M., & Agustines, D.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Galido, Pearl Valentine
Venue
Cureus
Published
2023-04-26
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
e38166-e38166
ISSN
2168-8184 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4367060129
Cited by
29
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 4
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Cureus (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
ChatGPT, treatment-resistant schizophrenia, large language models in medicine, clinical decision support, clozapine, electroconvulsive therapy, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, antipsychotic adverse effects, mood stabilizers, differential diagnosis of psychosis, treatment planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review