Cited by 82Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence ApplicationsEthics and Social Impacts of AI

Artificial Intelligence in Medicine & ChatGPT: De-Tether the Physician

Open access
DiGiorgio, Anthony M, Ehrenfeld, Jesse M·2023·Journal of Medical Systems

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10916-023-01926-3

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Judicious use of AI can reduce procedural tasks and unleash human creativity.

    “In fact, the judicious use of AI can reduce procedural tasks and unleash human creativity [82].”

    From Ethical Considerations of Using ChatGPT in Health Care (2023) · cites this paper as [82]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DiGiorgio, A. M., & Ehrenfeld, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
Corresponding author
DiGiorgio, Anthony M
Venue
Journal of Medical Systems
Published
2023-03-04
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
32-32
ISSN
  • 0148-5598 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-689X
OpenAlex
W4323050341
Cited by
82
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Systems (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • George Mason University
  • Mercatus Center, George Mason University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
artificial intelligence in healthcare, ChatGPT, physician role, clinical decision support, generative AI
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Physicians

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review