Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 259

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predicting COVID-19 Pneumonia Severity on Chest X-ray With Deep Learning

Open access
Cohen, Joseph Paul, Dao, Lan, Roth, Karsten, Morrison, Paul, Bengio, Yoshua, Abbasi, Almas F, Shen, Beiyi, Mahsa, Hoshmand Kochi, Ghassemi, Marzyeh, Li, Haifang, Duong, Tim·2020·Cureus

Abstract

Introduction The need to streamline patient management for coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) has become more pressing than ever. Chest X-rays (CXRs) provide a non-invasive (potentially bedside) tool to monitor the progression of the disease. In this study, we present a severity score prediction model for COVID-19 pneumonia for frontal chest X-ray images. Such a tool can gauge the severity of COVID-19 lung infections (and pneumonia in general) that can be used for escalation or de-escalation of care as well as monitoring treatment efficacy, especially in the ICU. Methods Images from a public COVID-19 database were scored retrospectively by three blinded experts in terms of the extent of lung involvement as well as the degree of opacity. A neural network model that was pre-trained on large (non-COVID-19) chest X-ray datasets is used to construct features for COVID-19 images which are predictive for our task. Results This study finds that training a regression model on a subset of the outputs from this pre-trained chest X-ray model predicts our geographic extent score (range 0-8) with 1.14 mean absolute error (MAE) and our lung opacity score (range 0-6) with 0.78 MAE. Conclusions These results indicate that our model's ability to gauge the severity of COVID-19 lung infections could be used for escalation or de-escalation of care as well as monitoring treatment efficacy, especially in the ICU. To enable follow up work, we make our code, labels, and data available online.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7759/cureus.9448

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 259

Metadata

Authors
Cohen, J. P., Dao, L., Roth, K., Morrison, P., Bengio, Y., Abbasi, A. F., Shen, B., Mahsa, H. K., Ghassemi, M., Li, H., & Duong, T.
Venue
Cureus
Published
2020-07-28
Volume
12
Issue
7
Pages
e9448-e9448
ISSN
2168-8184 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3027380610
Cited by
259
References
28
FWCI
24.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting COVID-19 Pneumonia Severity on Chest X-ray With Deep Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7759/cureus.9448
The paper
Cohen, J. P., Dao, L., Roth, K., Morrison, P., Bengio, Y., Abbasi, A. F., Shen, B., Mahsa, H. K., Ghassemi, M., Li, H., & Duong, T. (2020). Predicting COVID-19 Pneumonia Severity on Chest X-ray With Deep Learning. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.9448

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.