Cited by 6Psychometric Methodologies and TestingCognitive Abilities and TestingPsychological Testing and Assessment

Propiedades Psicométricas de la Escala WISC-V en Escolares Rurales Chilenos

Open access
Rodríguez-Cancino, Marcela, Vizcarra, María Beatriz, Concha-Salgado, Andrés·2022·Psykhe

Abstract

In Chile, the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for children (WISC-R and WISC-III) has been used massively in the urban and rural school populations, without having studies on its psychometric adjustment in the rural group. The present study explored the psychometric properties (evidence of internal structure validity and internal consistency) of the WISC-V in rural schoolchildren. An intentional non-probabilistic sample of 160 students between 6 and 16 years of age belonging to 4 educational establishments in the Maule region and 9 in La Araucanía, was evaluated. Three factorial models composed of 7, 10 and 15 subtests were tested. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis show adequate fit indices in these three models, consistent with the theoretical proposal by the author of the scale and especially better for the models with 7 and 10 primary subtests. Regarding reliability, adequate levels of internal consistency are observed, ranging between acceptable and good, in all the subtests in which this indicator could be calculated. Based on these results and for interpretive purposes, the use of the model composed of 10 primary subtests and the CIT as an estimator of general cognitive functioning in the Chilean rural population is recommended.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7764/psykhe.2020.22529

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The WISC-V shows adequate convergent and discriminant validity, particularly as a supporting instrument in the assessment of ADHD and other neurodevelopmental difficulties.

    “Likewise, it shows adequate convergent and discriminant validity, particularly as a supporting instrument in the assessment of ADHD and other neurodevelopmental difficulties [37, 38, 39].”

    From ADHD, Subtypes and Cognitive Performance: WISC-V as a Support Tool for Diagnostic Assessment (2026) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Results section (page unavailable) reports stronger correlations between WISC-V subtests within the same cognitive domain and weaker correlations across domains. The Discussion and Conclusions section describes this as evidence of validity based on internal structure and suggests use for assessing cognitive functioning in rural Chilean children. It does not establish convergent and discriminant validity for assessing ADHD or other neurodevelopmental difficulties. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Brenlla, M. E. (2013). Interpretación del WISC-IV. Puntuaciones compuestas y modelos CHC. Ciencias Psicológicas, 7(2), 183-197. http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1688-42212013000200007
  2. Canivez, G. L. & Watkins, M. W. (2016). Review of the Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition: Critique, commentary, and independent analyses. En A. S. Kaufman, S. E. Raiford & D. L. Coalson, Intelligent testing with the WISC-V (pp. 683-702). Wiley.
  3. Coronel, C. P., Lacunza, A. B. & Contini de González, N. (2006). Las habilidades cognitivas en niños privados culturalmente. Resultados preliminares de la primera fase de evaluación. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación -e Avaliação Psicológica, 2(22), 49-74. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/4596/459645449004.pdf
  4. Chen, F., Bollen, K. A., Paxton, P., Curran, P. J. & Kirby, J. B. (2001). Improper solutions in structural equation Models: Causes, consequences, and strategies. Sociological Methods & Research, 29(4), 468-508. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0049124101029004003 Fija normas para determinar los alumnos con necesidades educativas especiales que serán beneficiarios de las subvenciones para educación especial, Decreto 170, Ministerio de Educación de Chile (2009). https://www.leychile.cl/Navegar?idNorma=1012570 · DOI · Paper page
  5. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS Statistics 25 step by step: A simple guide and reference (15th Ed.). Taylor & Francis.
  6. Kaufman, A. S., Raiford, S. E. & Coalson, D. L. (2016). Intelligent testing with the WISC-V. Wiley.
  7. Martín Jorge, M. L. (2012). The Bellevue Intelligence Tests (Wechsler, 1939): ¿una medida de la inteligencia como capacidad de adaptación? Revista de Historia de la Psicología, 33(3), 49-66. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5450370
  8. Muñiz, J., Hernández, A. & Ponsoda, V. (2015). Nuevas directrices sobre el uso de los tests: Investigación, control de calidad y seguridad. Papeles del Psicólogo, 36(3), 161-173. http://www.papelesdelpsicologo.es/pdf/2609.pdf
  9. Rosas, R. & Pizarro, M. (2017). WISC-V: Manual de administración y corrección. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Centro de Desarrollo de Tecnologías de Inclusión & Pearson.
  10. Wechsler, D. (2014a). WISC-V Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition: Technical and interpretive manual. Pearson Clinical Assessment.
  11. Wechsler, D. (2014b). WISC-V CDN Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition: Canadian manual. Pearson Clinical Assessment Canada.
  12. Weiss, L. G., Saklofke, D. H., Holdnack, J. A. & Prifitera, A. (2019). WISC-V: Clinical use and interpretation, second edition. Elsevier.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodríguez-Cancino, M., Vizcarra, M. B., & Concha-Salgado, A.
Affiliations
Universidad de La Frontera (CL)
Venue
Psykhe
Published
2022-07-20
Volume
31
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0717-0297 (ISSN-L)
  • 0718-2228
OpenAlex
W4288071647
Cited by
5
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
Locations
  • Psykhe (Santiago) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Scientific Electronic Library Online (Scientific Electronic Library Online) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
WISC-V, Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, psychometric properties, rural schoolchildren, internal structure validity, internal consistency, confirmatory factor analysis, cognitive function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review