Cited by 27Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationEmpathy and Medical Education

Patient Perspectives on Communication with Primary Care Physicians about Chronic Low Back Pain

Open access
Evers, Sarah, Hsu, Clarissa, Sherman, Karen J, Balderson, Ben, Hawkes, Rene, Brewer, Georgie, La Porte, Anne-Marie, Yeoman, John +1 more·2017·The Permanente Journal

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a common health problem with challenges for providing satisfactory care. This study was undertaken to identify opportunities to improve key aspects of physicians' communications with CLBP-affected patients. METHODS: A series of 3 focus groups, each with 7 to 11 patients with CLBP, were recruited from primary care settings and grouped by risk level of reduced function resulting from back pain, to elicit perspectives about interactions with their primary care physicians. Analysis of focus group transcripts used an iterative process based on a thematic approach and a priori concepts. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients participated in the focus groups. Patient comments about communicating with physicians around CLBP fit into themes of listening and empathy, validating pain experiences, conducting effective CLBP assessment, providing clear diagnosis and information, and collaboratively working on treatment. Patients shared that physicians can foster positive interactions with CLBP-affected patients by sharing personal experiences of chronic pain, being truthful about not having all the answers and being clear about how patients can benefit from referrals, reviewing the patient's previous treatments before beginning conversations about treatment options, providing follow-up instructions, giving patients a diagnosis beyond "chronic pain," and explaining the role of imaging in their care. CONCLUSION: This study provides specific steps that physicians in the US can take to improve physician-patient interactions during primary care visits pertaining to CLBP. The findings could inform physician training, development of educational materials for patients, and future research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7812/tpp/16-177

Cites

26 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evers, S., Hsu, C., Sherman, K. J., Balderson, B., Hawkes, R., Brewer, G., La Porte, A.-M., Yeoman, J., & Cherkin, D.
Affiliations
  • Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
  • Research Associate at Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute and a Psychologist for Kaiser Permanente Washington-Behavioral Health in Seattle..
  • Patient Partner at Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute in Seattle..
Venue
The Permanente Journal
Published
2017-12
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
16-177
ISSN
  • 1552-5767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5775
OpenAlex
W2764105578
Cited by
27
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6
FWCI
3.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Permanente Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R21AT007326)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
Keywords
chronic low back pain, physician-patient communication, primary care, patient perspectives, empathy, chronic pain diagnosis, referral, treatment decision-making, physician training
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude of Health Personnel, Communication, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patients, United States, Patient Satisfaction, Low Back Pain, Focus Groups, Physicians, Primary Care, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review