Cited by 20Agriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentPlant and soil sciencesSustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis

Exploring agroecological approaches for sustainable agriculture and rural development: a comprehensive review

Open access
Bhandari, Sujan, Yadav, Bishnu, Yadav, Pawan Kumar, Lahutiya, Vivek, Koirala, Sudip·2024·Asian Journal of Research in Agriculture and Forestry

Abstract

Agroecology, as an interdisciplinary field, integrates ecological principles into agricultural systems to promote sustainability. This paper examines the pivotal role of agroecological approaches in fostering sustainable agriculture and rural development. Initially concentrated on enhancing crop productivity and resilience, agroecology has evolved to encompass broader dimensions, including environmental stewardship, social equity, and economic viability. By emphasizing the sustainable use of resources and adopting diverse strategies, agroecology addresses contemporary challenges in agricultural production. This review synthesizes existing literature on the fundamental concepts and principles of agroecology, highlighting its profound implications for sustainable agriculture and rural development. By exploring agroecological approaches at various scales, from plot-level interventions to systemic changes within the food system, this paper underscores the critical linkage between agroecology and the pursuit of sustainable agricultural practices and rural prosperity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.9734/ajraf/2024/v10i1271

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The observed positive correlation between CAET scores and biophysical soil characteristics may be attributed to the responsiveness of these indicators to changes in soil management practices such as farm diversification, crop-animal integration, agroforestry, cover cropping, and the addition of organic matter.

    “The observed positive correlation between CAET scores and biophysical soil characteristics (such as microbiological activity, color, odor, soil cover, and erosion) may be attributed to the responsiveness of these indicators to changes in soil management practices such as farm diversification, crop-animal integration, agroforestry, cover cropping, and the addition of organic matter (Bhandari et al.”

    From Agroecology for sustainable development: evidence on multidimensional performance from a cross-country TAPE assessment in Africa (2025) · cites this paper as Bhandari et al., 2024

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Agroecology presents a potential in simultaneously achieving multiple societal goals, but the transition is progressively slow.

    “The study findings from the four countries highlight that while agroecology presents a potential in simultaneously achieving multiple societal goals (Bhandari et al., 2024;Faure et al., 2024;Geels, 2011), the transition is progressively slow, necessitating more concerted efforts to unlock its full potential.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Wezel A, Bellon S, Doré T, Francis C, Vallod D, David C. Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. Sustainable Agriculture. 2009;2:27-43. Availavle:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-0 07-0394-0_3 · DOI
  2. Sharma R, Keval R, Yadav SPS, Yadav B. Screening of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) mill sp.] against blue butterfly, L. boeticus (L.)(Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in long duration pigeonpea genotypes. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 2022;SP- 11(9):1511-1514.
  3. Tilzey M. Political ecology, food regimes, and food sovereignty: Crisis, resistance, and resilience. Springer; 2017.
  4. Pretty JN, Williams S, Toulmin C. Sustainable intensification: Increasing productivity in African food and agricultural systems. Routledge; 2012.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhandari, S., Yadav, B., Yadav, P. K., Lahutiya, V., & Koirala, S.
Affiliations
  • Purbanchal University (NP)
  • Agriculture and Forestry University (NP)
Venue
Asian Journal of Research in Agriculture and Forestry
Published
2024-02-22
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
79-90
ISSN
2581-7418 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392081118
Cited by
20
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9
FWCI
14.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Asian Journal of Research in Agriculture and Forestry (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant and soil sciences
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
Keywords
agroecology, sustainable agriculture, rural development, crop productivity, crop resilience, environmental stewardship, social equity, economic feasibility, sustainable resource use, food systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review