Cited by 36Artificial Intelligence in EducationAcademic integrity and plagiarismArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Impact of Generative AI in Academic Integrity and Learning Outcomes: A Case Study in the Upper East Region

Open access
Wiredu, Japheth Kodua, Abuba, Nelson Seidu, Zakaria, Hassan·2024·Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science

Abstract

With the increasing use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools like ChatGPT and Bard, universities face challenges in maintaining academic integrity. This research investigates the impact of these tools on learning outcomes (factual knowledge, comprehension, critical thinking) in selected universities of Ghana's Upper East Region during the 2023-2024 academic year. The study specifically analyzes changes in student comprehension and academic integrity concerns when using Generative AI for content generation, research assistance, and summarizing complex topics. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining qualitative data from interviews and open-ended questions with quantitative analysis of survey data and academic records. The research focuses on three institutions: C. K. Tedam University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Bolgatanga Technical University, and Regentropfen University College. A purposive sampling technique recruited 150 participants (50 from each university) who had used Generative AI tools. Key findings show that 72% of students reported improved understanding of course material through Generative AI use, yet 75% cited academic integrity as a primary concern. Quantitative analysis revealed a weak to moderate positive correlation (r = 0.45) between AI tool usage and improved grades, with variations depending on the specific AI tasks performed. Qualitative data highlighted concerns about overreliance on AI and its impact on critical thinking skills. This research contributes to the ongoing debate on AI's role in education by providing valuable insights for educators and policymakers worldwide. The findings suggest that while AI tools can enhance comprehension, ethical considerations and potential drawbacks related to critical thinking require careful attention. The study concludes with recommendations for integrating AI literacy programs, developing ethical guidelines, and implementing advanced plagiarism detection systems to harness the benefits of Generative AI while mitigating risks to academic integrity. Although specific to the Upper East Region of Ghana, these insights may be applicable to other educational systems with similar characteristics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.9734/ajrcos/2024/v17i7491

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Generative AI can support learning outcomes but also increases integrity risks when AI literacy and institutional safeguards are insufficient, potentially widening educational inequalities where oversight capacity is limited.

    “Wiredu et al. report that generative AI can support learning outcomes, but also increases integrity risks when AI literacy and institutional safeguards are insufficient, potentially widening educational inequalities where oversight capacity is limited [9].”

    From Leveraging Artificial Intelligence in Scholarly Publishing (2025) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Introduction says generative AI can enhance learning while raising concerns about misuse and academic honesty. The Results and Recommendations call for ethical-use education, clear guidelines, and plagiarism detection to address integrity risks. Our copy does not say that limited oversight capacity could widen educational inequalities; that final implication goes beyond the paper. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Anantrasirichai N, Bull D. Artificial intelligence in the creative industries: A review. Artificial intelligence review. 2022;55(1):589-656.
  2. Michel-Villarreal R, Vilalta-Perdomo E, Salinas-Navarro DE, Thierry-Aguilera R, Gerardou FS. Challenges and opportunities of generative AI for higher education as explained by ChatGPT. Education Sciences. 2023;13(9):856.
  3. Pesovski I, Santos R, Henriques R, Trajkovik V. Generative AI for customizable learning experiences. Sustainability. 2024;16(7):3034.
  4. Hutson J. Rethinking plagiarism in the era of generative AI. Journal of Intelligent Communication. 2024;4(1):20-31. Available:https://doi.org/10.54963/jic.v4i1.2 · DOI
  5. Triantafyllou SA. Work in progress: Educational Technology and Knowledge Tracing Models, 2022 IEEE World Engineering Education Conference (EDUNINE), Santos, Brazil, 2022;1-4 DOI:10.1109/EDUNINE53672.2022.97823 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiredu, J. K., Abuba, N. S., & Zakaria, H.
Affiliations
Regentropfen University College (GH)
Venue
Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science
Published
2024-07-30
Volume
17
Issue
8
Pages
70-88
ISSN
2581-8260 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401120672
Cited by
35
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 3
FWCI
13.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science (publishedVersion)
  • Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
generative AI in education, academic integrity, learning outcomes, ChatGPT, student understanding, critical thinking, overreliance on AI, AI literacy, plagiarism detection, AI ethics in higher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review