Cited by 9COVID-19 and Mental HealthMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMental Health Treatment and Access

Prevalence of anxiety and depression during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: A web-based cross-sectional survey

Open access
Alhalafi, Abdullah Hassan·2020·Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International

Abstract

Today, every continent in the world is affected by the novel coronavirus2019 (COVID-19). Saudi Arabia has also suffered from this highly contagious, socially disruptive, infectious disease. Our aim was to assess the anxiety and depression prevalence and identify the associated risk factors among the general population of Riyadh city, Saudi Arabia, during COVID-19 outbreak. This cross-sectional study was conducted using a web-based survey. A total of 651 participants were recruited who were ≥18 years old and lived in Riyadh city during the COVID-19 pandemic. We collected sociodemographic information of the participants and assessed their COVID-19-related knowledge assessment. We used the Arabic versions of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 questionnaire and the Patient Health Questionnaire to assess the status of an individual’s anxiety and depression, respectively. We observed 28.7% and 25.5% prevalence of depression and anxiety among the general population, respectively. Females, younger people (age < 35 years), and unmarried persons showed a significantly higher prevalence of anxiety and depression. Binary logistic regression analysis also revealed that female gender, age younger than 35 years, having history of psychiatric diseases, and spending more than one hour per day on following COVID-19 news were associated with anxiety and depression. Retired participants were less likely to suffer from anxiety or depression during the pandemic. In this study, females, younger people (age < 35 years), and individuals with history of psychiatric patients were identified as vulnerable groups who need support during this crisis. We also recommend that the general public must limit their time of watching and following COVID-19-related news.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.9734/jpri/2020/v32i2730857

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The COVID-19 pandemic has caused considerable increases in psychological distress across the general population, not only among those directly affected by the virus.

    “global reports note considerable increases in psychological distress throughout the general population; not just those directly affected by the virus (Alhalafi, 2020; Chong et al., 2021; Ettman et al., 2020; Gloster, Lamnisos, et al., 2020; Rossi et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020).”

    From ACTing towards better living during COVID-19: The effects of Acceptance and Commitment therapy for individuals affected by COVID-19 (2022) · cites this paper as Alhalafi, 2020

    The Discussion reports higher prevalence of anxiety and depression in a general-population sample in Riyadh during the pandemic, supporting distress beyond people directly affected by the virus. But this single-city study does not establish an increase across the global general population; its limitations section also says the cross-sectional design makes causal inferences difficult. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. AlHadi AN, AlAteeq DA, Al-Sharif E, Bawazeer HM, Alanazi H, AlShomrani AT. An arabic translation, reliability, and validation of patient health questionnaire in a Saudi sample. Ann Gen Psychiatr. 2017; 16:32.
  2. Alibrahim OA, Al-Sadat N, Elawad NAM. Gender and risk of depression in Saudi Arabia, a systematic review and meta- analysis. J Pub Healt Africa. 2010;1:22-25.
  3. Torales J, O'Higgins M, Castaldelli-Maia JM, Ventriglio A. The outbreak of COVID- 19 coronavirus and its impact on global mental health. Int J Soc Psychiat. 2020; 66:317-320.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alhalafi, A. H.
Affiliations
University of Bisha (SA)
Corresponding author
Alhalafi, Abdullah Hassan
Venue
Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International
Published
2020-11-07
Volume
32
Issue
27
Pages
65-73
ISSN
  • 2231-2919 (ISSN-L)
  • 2456-9119
OpenAlex
W3103157197
Cited by
9
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, anxiety prevalence, depression prevalence, risk factors, gender differences, age differences, marital status, psychiatric history, news exposure, psychological distress, Riyadh

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review