Cited by 31Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCOVID-19 and Mental HealthDigital Mental Health Interventions

ACTing towards better living during COVID-19: The effects of Acceptance and Commitment therapy for individuals affected by COVID-19

Open access
Shepherd, Kate, Golijani-Moghaddam, Nima, Dawson, David L.·2022·Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

Abstract

The widespread effects of COVID-19 have dramatically increased the prevalence of mental health difficulties, meaning it is vital to explore psychotherapy options. Acceptance and Commitment therapy (ACT) helps individuals engage in meaningful activities despite difficult and unchangeable circumstances. Recent literature suggests that psychological flexibility, the underlying process of ACT, may moderate COVID-related distress – making ACT a promising psychotherapy candidate. This study therefore aimed to explore the effects of an ACT-based, guided self-help intervention on wellbeing, psychological flexibility, COVID-related distress, and general psychological distress within the general population. 48 participants (recruited via social media) engaged in a three-week, non-concurrent baseline phase, then received six, weekly, digital modules and weekly webinars to address module queries. 20 participants completed all modules and provided post-intervention feedback via an online qualitative survey. Multilevel modelling analysis found significant improvements in: wellbeing; overall psychological flexibility (including subscales behavioural awareness and valued action); and general psychological distress (including depression, anxiety and stress). No significant changes were found for COVID-related distress. Findings were sustained at one- and two-months follow-up – suggesting lasting change. Qualitative findings provide further insights about the experience of the intervention: participants reported improved wellbeing, still experiencing COVID-related distress, but felt more able to cope with general psychological distress (such as anxiety). No change in COVID-related distress scores may be due to methodological and measurement issues. This study is one of the first to explore ACT as a psychotherapeutic intervention for COVID-related distress and adds to the growing body of literature highlighting psychological flexibility as a key process for mitigating COVID-related distress. © 2022 Association for Contextual Behavioral Science

Verifying this paper

8 of 9 steps done · this page updates itself — you can leave and come back

  1. Registry recordVerified
  2. Full textRead the full text
  3. Reference list66 references found
  4. Reference checkChecking each cited work — 63 of 63
  5. StatisticsRecomputed
  6. Claims153 claims anchored to a quote
  7. Cited sourcesChecked
  8. Self-checkChecked
  9. VerificationFindings verified

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcbs.2021.12.003

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

27 of 56 cited sources checked · 15 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Psychological flexibility forecasts how well people handle COVID-related distress beyond other known coping factors in various populations.

    “literature from across multiple populations demonstrates that psychological flexibility predicts ability to cope with COVID-related distress over and above previously identified coping-factors (Dawson & Golijani-Moghaddam, 2020; Gloster, Lamnisos, et al., 2020; Pakenham et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Dawson & Golijani-Moghaddam, 2020 source
    • cites Gloster, Lamnisos, et al., 2020 source
    • cites Pakenham et al., 2020 source

      The Results (Moderation analyses; page unavailable) report that psychological flexibility mitigated the association between COVID-19 lockdown risk factors and distress, anxiety, and depression in the Italian sample. The Methods (Data analysis; page unavailable) describe adjustment for relevant demographics, but not a comparison with previously identified coping factors. This paper supports the protective association, not the claimed prediction over and above those factors. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    The COVID-19 pandemic has caused considerable increases in psychological distress across the general population, not only among those directly affected by the virus.

    “global reports note considerable increases in psychological distress throughout the general population; not just those directly affected by the virus (Alhalafi, 2020; Chong et al., 2021; Ettman et al., 2020; Gloster, Lamnisos, et al., 2020; Rossi et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Alhalafi, 2020 source

      The Discussion reports higher prevalence of anxiety and depression in a general-population sample in Riyadh during the pandemic, supporting distress beyond people directly affected by the virus. But this single-city study does not establish an increase across the global general population; its limitations section also says the cross-sectional design makes causal inferences difficult. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Chong et al., 2021 source

      The Introduction says COVID-19 had profound effects on public mental health and reports symptoms of depression, anxiety, stress, and insomnia in the general population, not only in patients. It does not establish a considerable increase relative to before the pandemic; the reported prevalence during the pandemic alone cannot show that change. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Ettman et al., 2020 source

      The Conclusions report that depression symptoms were more than threefold higher in a representative survey of US adults during COVID-19 and link the increase to the pandemic and its economic consequences. This supports an increase beyond people known to have had the virus, but the paper measures depression symptoms in the US, not psychological distress globally. It also says too few participants had been diagnosed with COVID-19 to compare those who had and had not been diagnosed. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Video conferencing is a viable medium to provide support in absence of face-to-face meetings.

    “evidence both prior to the pandemic and more recently suggests this may be a viable medium to provide support in the absence of face-to-face meetings (Karyotaki et al., 2018; Viswanathan et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Karyotaki et al., 2018 source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) describes guided internet-based depression interventions with support by email, phone, or e-chat, and the Conclusions endorse them as a treatment option. This supports providing help without face-to-face meetings, but the paper does not establish that video conferencing specifically is a viable medium. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Viswanathan et al., 2020 source
  • Premisecitation

    Recent literature points to ACT as a possible intervention for COVID-related distress.

    “recent literature is pointing towards ACT as a possible intervention to address COVID-related distress (Gloster, Lamnisos, et al., 2020; Kroska et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Gloster, Lamnisos, et al., 2020 source
    • cites Kroska et al., 2020 source
  • Premisecitation

    Online guided self-help has empirical support for matching face-to-face therapy in effectiveness.

    “Guided self-help is currently used throughout UKmental health services and is empirically supported to be as effective as face-to-face therapy when delivered online (Andersson et al., 2014; van't Hof et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Andersson et al., 2014 source
    • cites van't Hof et al., 2009 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 33
  • May combine two claims. 66
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Psychological flexibility interventions are suitable for wide digital distribution to reach a broad audience.

    “Gloster, Lamnisos, et al. (2020) note the suitability of psychological flexibility interventions to be widely distributed via digital means to reach a broad audience.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gloster, Lamnisos, et al., 2020 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Webinar ACT fidelity was assessed by two research team members using criteria based on ACT-FM, with scores 0-15.

    “Webinars were videorecorded and the two research team members assessed the ACT fidelity of their delivery according to criteria based on the ACT-FM (O'Neill et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites O'Neill et al., 2019 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Lower psychological flexibility is associated with poorer coping and increased psychopathology.

    “while lower psychological flexibility is well-documented to be associated with poorer coping and increased psychopathology (Kashdan et al., 2006; Levin et al., 2014; Woodruff et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Kashdan et al., 2006 source
    • cites Levin et al., 2014 source
    • cites Woodruff et al., 2014 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Mean pre-intervention scores indicated participants were in the 'low' wellbeing range (below 19.3) and experiencing COVID-related distress (above 6 out of 10).

    “Mean pre-intervention scores suggested at the beginning of the study participants were within the ‘low’ wellbeing range (below 19.3; Ng Fat et al., 2017) and were experiencing COVID-related distress (above 6 out of 10).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ng Fat et al., 2017 source
    • Rests on an assumption: The single-item Likert question used to measure COVID-related distress is a valid measure of that construct.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Attrition rates are similar to those seen in a similar study.

    “Attrition rates are similar to those seen a similar study (Price et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Price et al., 2012 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Price et al. found that previous experience of considering or using online mental health resources buffered against attrition, which may have been an unmeasured factor in this study.

    “Price et al. investigated reasons for early dropout and found that previous experience of considering/using online mental health resources buffered against attrition – this may have been an (unmeasured) factor contributing to variable engagement in the current study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Price et al. (2012) source

      The Discussion (page not provided) says that previously considering mental health treatment and using the Internet for health-related information were associated with reduced nonuse attrition. It also links online health or mental-health information use to reduced access or completion attrition. The paper does not say participants had previously considered using *online* mental-health resources; that combines two distinct predictors. The possibility that this was an unmeasured factor in the citing authors’ study is their own inference. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The observed pattern of early dropout is like that in Price et al. (2012).

    “The observed pattern of early dropout (including non-usage [i.e., pre-intervention] attrition) is like that observed by Price et al. (2012) in their (contextually comparable) study of a web-based intervention for post-disaster mental health.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Price et al. (2012) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    This finding is similar to existing literature that ACT consistently reduces depression, anxiety, and other mental health conditions.

    “This finding is similar to existing literature – ACT has been consistently found to reduce rates of depression, anxiety, and other mental health conditions (Bai et al., 2020; Stenhoff et al., 2020; Swain et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bai et al., 2020 source
    • cites Stenhoff et al., 2020 source
    • cites Swain et al., 2013 source

      The Conclusion (p. 12) says the review provides preliminary support for ACT in treating anxiety, while emphasizing methodological limitations and the need for replication. The General anxiety symptoms section (p. 9) reports improvement in a trial including patients with anxiety and/or depression, but says outcomes were not broken down by condition. This source does not establish that ACT consistently reduces depression and other mental health conditions, or their rates. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Psychological flexibility is malleable and trainable to support coping with distressing events, and interventions targeting it may help mitigate mental health effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    “Psychological flexibility has been found to be malleable and trainable to support individuals to cope with distressing events, and interventions which target psychological flexibility may be particularly helpful in mitigating the mental health effects of the COVID-19 pandemic (Gloster et al., 2017, 2020a; Kroska et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Gloster et al., 2017, 2020a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Kroska et al., 2020 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    FIML has been shown to produce estimates that are the best estimates of true effects under missingness, outperforming other approaches.

    “this approach has been shown to produce estimates that are the best estimates of true effects (observed in complete data sets) under conditions of missingness (e.g., Witkiewitz et al., 2014), outperforming other approaches to handling missing data.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Witkiewitz et al., 2014 source

      The Abstract (Conclusions) says FIML and multiple imputation (MI) yielded the best estimates of treatment effects for a continuous heavy-drinking outcome when participants dropped out of an alcohol trial. The Discussion says they performed equally well, so the source does not support FIML outperforming MI or establish the claim for missing data generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    48 participants completed at least one baseline data point ('starters'); 22 in group one; 13 in groups two and three.

    “48 participants completed at least one baseline data point (‘starters’); 22 participants in group one; and 13 participants in both groups two and three.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Thirteen participants reported increased acceptance of difficult experiences, which positively affected their lives.

    “Thirteen participants stated that their acceptance of difficult experiences had increased, which positively impact their lives”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Two participants reported not worrying about COVID daily as a result of the intervention; two reported distress but feeling calmer and more able to cope; four reported still being fearful of COVID-19.

    “Two participants described “not worrying about COVID on a daily basis” (ppt20) as a result of the intervention; two participants expressed experiencing distress but feeling “calmer and more able to cope” (ppt14); and four participants reported being “still fearful of COVID-19” (ppt7).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    One participant with worsening mental health described acceptance as particularly reassuring within the intervention.

    “One participant who reported worsening mental health post-intervention (due to changing life-circumstances) described acceptance as “particularly reassuring” within the intervention (ppt16).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    No significant changes occurred between post-intervention and two-month follow-up for outcomes that had significant pre-post changes, indicating maintenance.

    “No significant changes were seen between post-intervention and two-month follow-up for outcome variables which demonstrated significant changes between pre- and post-interventions – indicating post-therapy change was maintained.”
    • Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
      “no significant changes were observed between post-intervention and two-month follow-up for outcome variables which demonstrated significant changes between pre- and post-intervention”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Some participants reported negative changes post-intervention, typically attributed to external COVID-19 factors such as lockdown restriction changes.

    “Some participants reported negative changes post-intervention; participants typically attributed these to external COVID-19 factors (e.g., lockdown restriction changes).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For all outcome variables except BA and COVID-related distress, significant pre- to post-intervention changes occurred, indicating improvement over therapy.

    “For all outcome variables except BA and COVID-related distress, significant changes were found between pre- and post-intervention scores – indicating these had improved over the course of therapy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Effect sizes for outcomes with significant phase effects were small-to-medium, except overall psychological flexibility, which was medium-to-large.

    “Small-to-medium effect sizes were found for all outcome variables which exhibited this significant effect, except for overall psychological flexibility which demonstrated a medium-to-large effect size (Cohen, 1988).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cohen, 1988

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Of the three reporting worsening, one found the intervention unhelpful, one did not comment, and one found it helpful but felt difficulties exceeded therapy level due to changing life circumstances.

    “Of these three, one found the intervention unhelpful (but did not further specify); one did not comment on the intervention; and one described the intervention as helpful but felt their “difficulties have escalated beyond this level of therapy” (due to changing life-circumstances; ppt16).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    BA showed significant differences between pre-intervention and two-month follow-up, and between post-intervention and two-month follow-up.

    “Regarding BA, significant differences were found between pre-intervention and two-month follow-up scores, as well as between post-intervention and two-month follow-up.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants noted valued action rather than values clarity was helpful, but both were described as useful.

    “Participants particularly noted valued action (rather than values clarity) was helpful, however both were described as useful”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Overall psychological flexibility improved with medium-to-large effect sizes, but differences were found between the three sub-processes.

    “Overall psychological flexibility improved, demonstrating medium-to-large effect sizes, yet analysis found differences between the three sub-processes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    One participant provided only one comment, describing the intervention as interesting self-reflection.

    “One participant only provided one comment regarding the intervention within the post-intervention survey, which was that the intervention provided “interesting self-reflection” (ppt4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    One participant attributed increased anxiety to the COVID-19 pandemic; the other did not give a reason.

    “One participant (ppt12) specified that this was due to the COVID-19 pandemic, whereas the second (ppt18) did not express a reason.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants reported feeling more positive and better about things, and some referenced feelings of wellbeing.

    “Participants reported feeling “more positive” (ppt10) and “better about things” (ppt6), however some participants also referenced “feelings of wellbeing” (ppt20) specifically.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants attributed improved wellbeing to using psychological flexibility processes, adding credibility to the idea.

    “participants attributed improved wellbeing to using psychological flexibility processes (in their qualitative responses) – adding credibility to this idea.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Of those who mentioned COVID-related distress, participants described either no longer experiencing it or experiencing but coping better.

    “Of those that did, participants described either no longer experiencing COVID-related distress, or experiencing but coping better with COVID-related distress.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Twelve participants referenced anxiety.

    “Twelve participants referenced ‘anxiety’.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    VA and OE showed significant improvements over timepoints, whereas BA showed no improvement until follow-up.

    “Conversely, both VA and OE demonstrated significant improvements throughout the intervention when exploring the effect of timepoint, whereas BA showed no improvement until follow-up.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants attributed outcomes to intervention techniques and increased psychological flexibility processes.

    “Participants attributed outcomes to intervention techniques and increased psychological flexibility processes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Most participants reported general mental health improvement; two reported no change; three reported worsening.

    “most participants reported a general improvement; two participants reported no changes; and three participants reported worsening mental health.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Following the intervention, significant improvements were found for wellbeing, overall psychological flexibility (and VA), and general psychological distress (including depression, stress, anxiety).

    “Following the intervention, significant improvements were found for wellbeing, overall psychological flexibility (and one sub-process, VA) and general psychological distress (including depression, stress, and anxiety).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    No participant gave a response inconsistent with the insight theme.

    “No participant gave a response that was inconsistent with (i.e., reputational to) this theme.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Improved wellbeing was mentioned by 13 participants, making it the second most mentioned effect after changes in psychological flexibility processes.

    “Improved wellbeing as an effect of the intervention was mentioned by 13 participants, making this the second most mentioned effect of the intervention after changes in psychological flexibility processes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants reported feeling more confident in decisions, working on themselves more, and giving themselves time to reflect daily.

    “Participants reported feeling “more confident in making decisions” (ppt2), “working on myself more” (ppt10) and that they now “give [themselves] time to reflect each day” (ppt7).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    VA and BA showed significant phase effects with small-to-medium effect sizes, whereas OE did not.

    “VA and BA both demonstrated a significant phase effect (following the addition of the intervention) with small-to-medium effect sizes, whereas no such effects were found for OE.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Most themes had at least one contradictory opinion to the majority view.

    “Most themes had at least one contradictory opinion to the majority view.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Eight participants discussed finding defusion helpful and used it to aid other processes.

    “Eight participants discussed finding defusion helpful, using defusion to aid other processes”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Content analysis identified five main themes regarding the intervention's effects.

    “content analysis found five main themes regarding the effects of the intervention.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Several participants remained anxious post-intervention but felt they coped better.

    “Several participants described remaining anxious post-intervention, but felt they coped better”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Qualitatively, participants mentioned all three processes equally, but described OE and VA techniques in detail while only vaguely referencing BA.

    “Qualitatively, participants mentioned all three processes equally, yet described OE and VA techniques in detail whilst only vaguely referencing BA factors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Qualitative results supported quantitative findings: most participants reported improved mental health (particularly anxiety) and improved wellbeing.

    “Qualitative results supported quantitative findings: most participants reported improved mental health (particularly anxiety) and improved wellbeing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    COVID-related distress scores were high at pre- and post-intervention (mean above 6/10) and did not change significantly, suggesting participants were distressed by COVID-19 throughout the study.

    “COVID-related distress scores were high at both pre- and post-intervention (with a mean score of above 6 out of 10) and did not change significantly, suggesting participants were distressed by COVID-19 throughout the study.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Eight participants discussed finding mindfulness helpful and reported increased present-moment awareness, but gave no further detail on wider effects.

    “Eight participants discussed finding mindfulness helpful and reported increased present-moment awareness post-intervention, however no participant gave further detail on any wider effects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Two participants said the intervention's effects extended beyond COVID and also reduced COVID-related distress.

    “Two participants expressed that the effects of the intervention had “hit wider than COVID” (ppt17), as well as reducing COVID-related distress.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All domains of psychological distress (overall distress, depression, anxiety, stress) significantly reduced following the intervention and were maintained at follow-up.

    “all domains of psychological distress (including overall distress, depression, anxiety and stress), significantly reduced following the introduction of the intervention which was maintained at follow-up.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    COVID-related distress did not reduce following the intervention, possibly due to measurement limitations.

    “COVID-related distress did not reduce following the intervention; however, this may be due to limitations in the ways in which this was measured.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Most participants commented about the modules; comments were typically positive, but some activities and sections were noted as unhelpful or inaccessible.

    “most participants commented about the modules in the post-intervention survey. Comments were typically positive; however, some activities and sections were noted to be unhelpful or inaccessible.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The study found the intervention improved wellbeing and psychological distress but had limited effect on COVID-related distress.

    “The study found that the intervention improved wellbeing and psychological distress yet had a limited effect on COVID-related distress.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Several participants described anxiety of similar or greater intensity than before but felt more able to cope.

    “several participants described experiences of anxiety (of similar or greater intensity as before intervention) yet felt more able to cope with these experiences.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Baseline differences between intervention completers and non-completers were explored using independent t-tests and Fisher exact tests.

    “We also explored baseline differences between intervention completers versus non-completers using independent t-tests (for continuous variables) and Fisher exact tests (for categorical variables).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    ACT seeks to increase psychological flexibility and wellbeing by targeting six core processes.

    “ACT seeks to increase psychological flexibility, and thus wellbeing, by targeting the six psychological flexibility core processes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Harris, 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Hayes et al., 2012 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Residual normality and linearity were examined, and an AR1 covariance structure was used to handle anticipated autocorrelation.

    “For each outcome model, we checked for normality of residuals (via histograms) and linearity (via scatterplots); we expected that the assumption of independence structure would be violated given likely autocorrelation over time (serial dependence in observations) and thus modelled a first-order autoregressive covariance structure (AR1) to account for this.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Baseline data for each weekly outcome were checked for significant trends to see whether a stable baseline had been reached.

    “For each of the (six) weekly outcome and process variables (wellbeing, COVID-related distress, psychological flexibility, OE, BA, VA), baseline data were first explored for significant trends (i.e., any within-phase effect of time) to determine if a stable baseline was achieved.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A meta-analysis of thirteen studies established that ACT guided self-help may help ease depression and anxiety distress, with increased clinician support improving outcomes.

    “A meta-analysis reviewing thirteen studies established that ACT guided self-help may help to ease the distress of depression and anxiety, with increased clinician support improving outcomes (French et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites French et al., 2017 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A recent large-scale UK survey found that more than half of respondents satisfied criteria for common mental health conditions.

    “In a recent large-scale UK survey, over half of respondents met criteria for common mental health conditions (Pieh et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pieh et al., 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    ACT aims to help individuals live alongside psychological pain, regardless of distress manifestation, to improve overall wellbeing.

    “ACT aims to help individuals live alongside psychological pain, regardless of the manifestation of the distress, to improve overall wellbeing.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Harris, 2006

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Hayes et al., 2012 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    ACT holds that psychological pain is a normal and unavoidable reaction to hard circumstances.

    “ACT posits that psychological pain is a healthy and inevitable response to difficult situations (Harris, 2006; Hayes et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Harris, 2006

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Hayes et al., 2012 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    According to ACT, mental health problems are believed to stem from trying too hard to avoid or control pain, which produces rigid behaviour and interferes with valued activities.

    “Mental ill-health is thought to arise from excessive attempts to avoid or control this pain, resulting in rigid and inflexible behaviour which disrupts personally meaningful activities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Harris, 2006

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Hayes et al., 2012 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    A concurrent triangulation design was applied to mixing methods, with quantitative and qualitative data analysed separately then interpretively synthesised and triangulated.

    “We applied a concurrent triangulation design (convergence model) in our approach to mixing methods (Creswell & Piano Clark, 2017). Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed separately (reported in the results section) and then interpretively synthesised and triangulated (in the discussion section).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Creswell & Piano Clark, 2017

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    COVID-related distress is not confined to people who work directly with the virus or are infected, and it may be widespread in the population.

    “This suggests distress related to COVID-19 affects more than just those directly working with or suffering from the virus and may be pervasive throughout the population.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    ACT consistency of module materials was assessed by two trained research team members not involved in adaptation, who agreed all ACT sub-processes were well-represented and materials were model-consistent.

    “The ACT consistency of module materials was assessed by two members of the research team trained in ACT who were not involved in the adaptation process prior to the start of the study: Assessors agreed that all ACT sub-processes were well-represented and that materials were model-consistent (with reference to Hayes & Smith, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hayes & Smith, 2005

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Longitudinal data analyses such as MLM can explain variation over time within and between participants and are robust against missing data points.

    “Longitudinal data analyses (such as multilevel modelling; MLM) are able to explain variation over time, both within and between participants, and are robust against missing data points (Tasca & Gallop, 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tasca & Gallop, 2009 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Because the analyses were exploratory and secondary, no correction for multiple comparisons was applied; however, the authors flag effects that would fail a Bonferroni threshold.

    “Given the exploratory and secondary nature of these analyses, no adjustments were made for multiple comparisons. However, to illustrate the impact of applying multiplicity adjustments, we note where significant effects would not survive Bonferroni correction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Table 4 shows similar demographic variables, wellbeing and COVID-related distress pre-intervention scores between starters and completers.

    “Table 4 provides demographic information for ‘starters’ compared to ‘completers’, and shows similar demographic variables, as well as wellbeing and COVID-related distress pre-intervention scores, between the two.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    18 participants completed both one- and two-month follow-up measures.

    “Eighteen participants completed both one- and two-month follow-up measures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    All improvements were sustained at follow-up, suggesting lasting change.

    “All improvements were sustained at follow-up, suggesting lasting change.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    20 participants completed the six-week intervention ('completers'), with majority attrition in baseline (n=15) and early intervention (n=12 pre-midpoint; n=2 post-midpoint).

    “20 participants completed the six-week intervention (‘completers’), with the majority of attrition occurring within the baseline phase (n = 15) and early in the intervention phase (n = 12 pre-midpoint; n = 2 post-midpoint).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Results suggest improvements in wellbeing may come from overall improvement in psychological flexibility and may occur without improvements in specific sub-processes.

    “These results could suggest that improvements in wellbeing come from an overall improvement in psychological flexibility, and therefore may still occur in the absence of improvements in specific sub-processes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Change in VA was consistently evidenced across analyses and had the greatest phase-change effect size, indicating increased valued living may be particularly potent.

    “change in VA was consistently evidenced across analyses (and demonstrated the greatest effect size in phase-change analyses), indicating that (of ACT processes that might be contributory to outcome changes) increased engagement in valued living may be particularly potent.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Normality and linearity assumptions were adequate, and autocorrelation was accounted for in the multilevel models.

    “Parametric assumptions of normality were assessed and found to be adequate, data were found to be linear, and auto-correlation was taken into account during MLM modelling to accommodate the assumption of independent data points.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The absence of change in COVID-related distress scores might reflect problems with methods or measurement.

    “No change in COVID-related distress scores may be due to methodological and measurement issues.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    All 20 intervention completers completed the post-intervention survey, but three provided minimal information, so their views may not be fully represented.

    “All 20 intervention-completers engaged in the post-intervention survey, however three participants provided minimal information (fewer than four comments each). These participants' views may, therefore, not be fully represented in analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Recent literature suggests psychological flexibility may moderate COVID-related distress.

    “Recent literature suggests that psychological flexibility, the underlying process of ACT, may moderate COVID-related distress – making ACT a promising psychotherapy candidate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Although fewer participants mentioned self-worth, it was mentioned repeatedly and was clearly important for those individuals.

    “Although fewer participants mentioned this area, it was mentioned repeatedly and was clearly of importance for these individuals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    22 participants completed post-intervention measures, including two who withdrew during intervention and offered to complete exit measures.

    “22 participants completed post-intervention measures, including two participants who withdrew during the intervention phase and offered to complete exit measures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Detailed information about module use was not gathered.

    “Detailed information regarding module use was not gathered as this was outside the aims of this study”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Completers and non-completers did not show substantive baseline differences, but unmeasured differences may account for dropout.

    “In terms of measured variables, completers and non-completers did not show substantive differences at baseline, but there may be unmeasured differences accounting for dropout.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    At the time of writing, this is the first study to implement an ACT intervention to explore its effects.

    “At the time of writing, this is the first study to implement an ACT intervention to explore the effects of this.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    At the time of writing, this is the first study to proceed to intervention and demonstrate that ACT improves wellbeing within the COVID-19 pandemic context.

    “At the time of writing, this is the first study to proceed to intervention and demonstrate that ACT, an intervention targeting psychological flexibility, improves wellbeing within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Findings regarding COVID-related distress should be seen as an indication of participants' experiences rather than firm conclusions and warrant further investigation.

    “this study's findings regarding COVID-related distress may be seen as an indication of participants' experiences, rather than firm conclusions, and warrant further scientific investigation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The intervention demonstrated promising effects using scalable and remotely deliverable materials suited to the current context.

    “The intervention has demonstrated promising effects utilising a scalable and remotely deliverable materials (suited to the current context)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The study presents a scalable, flexible, remotely accessible intervention suited to delivery in the current climate.

    “This study also presents a scalable intervention (i.e., one that could be readily adapted to greater demand, as a low-resource digital provision) which is flexible and remotely accessible: making it well suited to delivery within the current climate.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The non-concurrent baseline, time-series design, and multiple testing improved internal validity.

    “The non-concurrent baseline, time-series design and multiple testing improved internal validity”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The anonymous format of the post-intervention survey may have reduced demand characteristics, supporting the findings.

    “the anonymous format of the post-intervention survey may have reduced demand characteristics – further supporting the findings of the study and highlighting an important study strength.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Both quantitative and qualitative findings suggest ACT improves wellbeing, psychological flexibility, and psychological distress.

    “Both quantitative and qualitative findings suggest ACT improves wellbeing, as well as psychological flexibility and psychological distress.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Findings regarding increased wellbeing and lower psychological distress were established using measures with strong psychometric qualities and may be more representative of the intervention's effects.

    “The findings regarding increased wellbeing and lower psychological distress, however, were established using measures with strong psychometric qualities, and therefore these findings may be more representative of the effects of the intervention.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The single weekly question may not have fully or accurately captured COVID-related distress, so findings related to it may not be valid or reliable.

    “It may be that this question did not fully or accurately capture COVID-related distress, meaning findings related to COVID-related distress may not be valid or reliable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
88 of 88
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Participants recruited through social media and UK-specific forums are representative of the general population experiencing COVID-related distress.

    “Advertisements were posted on social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram) and UK-specific forums (Reddit), specifically seeking “individuals struggling to cope with stresses caused by COVID-19” to engage in an online, self-help, psychotherapy, research study, utilising snowball sampling”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The single-item Likert question used to measure COVID-related distress is a valid measure of that construct.

    “To explore the additional outcome variable ‘COVID-related distress’, participants were asked, “Over the past week, how have you felt about the COVID-19 situation?” on a Likert-scale of 0 (“I have been feeling OK about it”) to 10 (“I have been extremely distressed by it”).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Changes observed during the intervention are attributable to the ACT intervention rather than to the passage of time or other concurrent events.

    “A mixed-methods, AB, interventional, time-series design was used to meet the aims of the study. Three groups engaged in a three-week baseline phase, with stratified start-dates to establish a non-concurrent baseline, followed by a six-week intervention phase, post-intervention measures, and two follow-up periods at one- and two-months post-intervention.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The one- and two-month follow-up periods are sufficient to demonstrate that improvements are lasting.

    “Findings were sustained at one- and two-months follow-up – suggesting lasting change.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Qualitative survey responses accurately reflect participants' experiences.

    “Participants provided feedback post-intervention via an anonymous, open-answer, online survey, based on guidance for change interviews by Elliott (2006).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    At the time the study began, no peer-reviewed measure for assessing COVID-related distress existed.

    “at the time of inception no peer reviewed measures to assess COVID-related distress existed.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Several studies have identified psychological flexibility as a target mechanism for addressing COVID-19 related distress.

    “Several studies have identified psychological flexibility as a target mechanism for addressing COVID-19 related distress.”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A self-help digital intervention conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic improved well-being in students who reported persistent experiences of COVID-related distress but felt better able to cope with general psychological distress, such as anxiety.

    “A self-help digital intervention conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic improved well-being in students who reported persistent experiences of COVID-related distress but felt better able to cope with general psychological distress, such as anxiety”

    From Examining the effectiveness and acceptability of a group-based ACT intervention delivered by videoconference to international university students during the COVID-19 pandemic. (2024) · cites this paper as Shepherd, Golijani-Moghaddam, & Dawson, 2022

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Attrition counts exceed the number of non-completers

    Minor

    The reported attrition counts total 29, but 48 starters and 20 completers leave only 28 non-completers.

1 of 1

Cited works that were retracted

Works this paper cites that were later retracted, from the retraction notices publishers deposit. Major when the notice came out before this paper was published.

  • Cites a retracted work: 10.1192/bjo.2018.12

    Major

    The cited work was retracted on 2019-06-17 (notice 10.1192/bjo.2019.46), before this paper was published (2022-01). Its authors could have known.

    Cited work 10.1192/bjo.2018.12 · retracted 2019-06-17 · notice 10.1192/bjo.2019.46 · this paper published 2022-01

1 of 1

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Riedel-Heller, 2020, COVID-19 pandemic and mental health of the general public: Is there a tsunami of mental disorders?, Psychiatrische Praxis, 47, 452

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shepherd, K., Golijani-Moghaddam, N., & Dawson, D. L.
Affiliations
University of Lincoln (GB)
Corresponding author
Shepherd, Kate
Venue
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
23
Pages
98-108
ISSN
2212-1447 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200605766
Cited by
31
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
4.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Lincoln University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, COVID-19 pandemic, psychological flexibility, psychological distress, well-being, digital psychotherapy, depression, anxiety, stress, coping, valued action

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review