Cited by 26Ultrasound in Clinical ApplicationsGlobal Health and SurgeryArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Web-Based Quality Assurance Process Drives Improvements in Obstetric Ultrasound in 5 Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Open access

Abstract

High quality is important in medical imaging, yet in many geographic areas, highly skilled sonographers are in short supply. Advances in Internet capacity along with the development of reliable portable ultrasounds have created an opportunity to provide centralized remote quality assurance (QA) for ultrasound exams performed at rural sites worldwide. We sought to harness these advances by developing a web-based tool to facilitate QA activities for newly trained sonographers who were taking part in a cluster randomized trial investigating the role of limited obstetric ultrasound to improve pregnancy outcomes in 5 low- and middle-income countries. We were challenged by connectivity issues, by country-specific needs for website usability, and by the overall need for a high-throughput system. After systematically addressing these needs, the resulting QA website helped drive ultrasound quality improvement across all 5 countries. It now offers the potential for adoption by future ultrasound- or imaging-based global health initiatives.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.9745/ghsp-d-16-00156

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ultrasound training programs have taught non-experts either to independently perform obstetric ultrasounds to screen for high-risk pregnancies or to utilize tele-ultrasound.

    “In an attempt to overcome such challenges, ultrasound training programs have taught non-experts either to independently perform obstetric ultrasounds to screen for high-risk pregnancies (52–55) or to utilize tele-ultrasound (29, 34, 37, 38).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Swanson, J. O., Plotner, D., Franklin, H. L., Swanson, D. L., Lokomba Bolamba, V., Lokangaka, A., Sayury Pineda, I., Figueroa, L., Garces, A., Muyodi, D., Esamai, F., Kanaiza, N., Mirza, W., Naqvi, F., Saleem, S., Mwenechanya, M., Chiwila, M., Hamsumonde, D., McClure, E. M., Goldenberg, R. L., & Nathan, R. O.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington Medical Center (US)
  • RTI International (US)
  • University of Kinshasa (CD)
  • Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama (GT)
  • Moi University (KE)
  • Aga Khan University (PK)
  • University Teaching Hospital (ZM)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Swanson, Jonathan O
Venue
Global Health Science and Practice
Published
2016-12-23
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
675-683
ISSN
2169-575X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2561488973
Cited by
26
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Global Health Science and Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • University of Washington
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U10HD078438)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health and Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
prenatal ultrasound, quality assurance, sonographer training, low- and middle-income countries, rural health facilities, portable ultrasound, internet access, website usability, global health, pregnancy outcomes
MeSH terms
Congo, Developing Countries, Female, Guatemala, Humans, Kenya, Obstetrics, Pakistan, Pregnancy, Ultrasonography, Zambia, Telemedicine, Internet, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review