Prenatal Exposure to Maternal Cigarette Smoking, Amygdala Volume, and Fat Intake in Adolescence
Open accessAbstract
CONTEXT: Prenatal exposure to maternal cigarette smoking is a well-established risk factor for obesity, but the underlying mechanisms are not known. Preference for fatty foods, regulated in part by the brain reward system, may contribute to the development of obesity. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether prenatal exposure to maternal cigarette smoking is associated with enhanced fat intake and risk for obesity, and whether these associations may be related to subtle structural variations in brain regions involved in reward processing. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of a population-based cohort. SETTING: The Saguenay Youth Study, Quebec, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 378 adolescents (aged 13 to 19 years; Tanner stage 4 and 5 of sexual maturation), half of whom were exposed prenatally to maternal cigarette smoking (mean [SD], 11.1 [6.8] cigarettes/d). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fat intake was assessed with a 24-hour food recall (percentage of energy intake consumed as fat). Body adiposity was measured with anthropometry and multifrequency bioimpedance. Volumes of key brain structures involved in reward processing, namely the amygdala, nucleus accumbens, and orbitofrontal cortex, were measured with magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Exposed vs nonexposed subjects exhibited a higher total body fat (by approximately 1.7 kg; P = .009) and fat intake (by 2.7%; P = .001). They also exhibited a lower volume of the amygdala (by 95 mm3; P < .001) but not of the other 2 brain structures. Consistent with its possible role in limiting fat intake, amygdala volume correlated inversely with fat intake (r = -0.15; P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal exposure to maternal cigarette smoking may promote obesity by enhancing dietary preference for fat, and this effect may be mediated in part through subtle structural variations in the amygdala.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Human fetal tobacco exposure studies agree with animal nicotine studies, especially regarding brain disruption independent of fetal growth.
“Taken together, studies of tobacco exposure in human fetuses are in agreement with those of nicotine exposure in animals, and in particular, those which documented disruption of brain development independent of effects on fetal growth.”
From Developmental toxicity of nicotine: A transdisciplinary synthesis and implications for emerging tobacco products (2017) · cites this paper as [89]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Obesity in Young Men after Famine Exposure in Utero and Early Infancy
Ravelli, G.-P., Stein, Z. A., & Susser, M. W. (1976) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197608122950701 · Cited by 1,647 · see citing works
Multiple reward signals in the brain
Schultz, W. (2000) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35044563 · Cited by 1,303 · see citing works
Cnattingius, S. (2004) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1080/14622200410001669187 · Cited by 1,126 · see citing works
Brain nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: native subtypes and their relevance
Gotti, C., Zoli, M., & Clementi, F. (2006) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2006.07.004 · Cited by 882 · see citing works
Slotkin, T. A. (2004) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.taap.2003.06.001 · Cited by 544 · see citing works
Lotfipour, S., Ferguson, E., Leonard, G., Perron, M., Pike, B., Richer, L., Séguin, J. R., Toro, R., Veillette, S., Pausova, Z., et al. (2009) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.124 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Self-citationKane, V. B., Fu, Y., Matta, S. G., & Sharp, B. M. (2004) · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1124/jpet.103.059899 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
England, L. J., Aagaard, K., Bloch, M., Conway, K., Cosgrove, K., Grana, R., Gould, T. J., Hatsukami, D., Jensen, F., Kandel, D., et al. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.11.013 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Prenatal tobacco exposure and brain morphology: a prospective study in young children
El Marroun, H., Schmidt, M. N., Franken, I. H. A., Jaddoe, V. W. V., Hofman, A., van der Lugt, A., Verhulst, F. C., Tiemeier, H., & White, T. (2014) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2013.273 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Albers, L., Sobotzki, C., Kuß, O., Ajslev, T., Batista, R. F., Bettiol, H., Brabin, B., Buka, S. L., Cardoso, V. C., Clifton, V. L., et al. (2018) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/s41366-018-0050-0 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citationZou, R., Boer, O. D., Felix, J. F., Muetzel, R. L., Franken, I. H. A., Cecil, C. A. M., & El Marroun, H. (2022) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.24701 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Alruwaili, A., Nayeemullah, R., Engin, B., Malaikah, S., James, L., Sanders, J. P., Thivel, D., Thackray, A. E., Stensel, D. J., King, J. A., et al. (2025) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2025.108194 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Haghighi, A., Schwartz, D. H., Abrahamowicz, M., Leonard, G. T., Perron, M., Richer, L., Veillette, S., Gaudet, D., Paus, T., & Pausova, Z.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (CA)
- Venue
- JAMA Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2013-01-01
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 98
- ISSN
- 2168-622X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122340290
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7
- FWCI
- 5.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Constellation (Université du Québec à Chicoutimi) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
- McGill University
- University of Toronto
- Heart And Stroke Foundation Of Quebec
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Keywords
- prenatal tobacco exposure, maternal smoking, adolescent obesity, dietary fat intake, amygdala volume, brain reward system, nucleus accumbens, orbitofrontal cortex, adiposity
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Amygdala, Energy Intake, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dietary Fats, Female, Humans, Male, Obesity, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Risk, Smoking, Cohort Studies, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review