Cited by 58Smoking Behavior and CessationPrenatal Substance Exposure EffectsObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Maternal smoking during pregnancy and offspring overweight: is there a dose–response relationship? An individual patient data meta-analysis

Open access
Albers, Lucia, Sobotzki, Christina, Kuß, Oliver, Ajslev, Teresa, Batista, Rosangela FL, Bettiol, Heloisa, Brabin, Bernard, Buka, Stephen L +22 more·2018·International Journal of Obesity

Abstract

Background/objectives A number of meta-analyses suggest an association between any maternal smoking in pregnancy and offspring overweight obesity. Whether there is a dose-response relationship across number of cigarettes and whether this differs by sex remains unclear. Subject/methods Studies reporting number of cigarettes smoked during pregnancy and offspring BMI published up to May 2015 were searched. An individual patient data meta-analysis of association between the number of cigarettes smoked during pregnancy and offspring overweight (defined according to the International Obesity Task Force reference) was computed using a generalized additive mixed model with non-linear effects and adjustment for confounders (maternal weight status, breastfeeding, and maternal education) and stratification for sex. Results Of 26 identified studies, 16 authors provided data on a total of 238,340 mother-child-pairs. A linear positive association was observed between the number of cigarettes smoked and offspring overweight for up to 15 cigarettes per day with an OR increase per cigarette of 1.03, 95% CI = [1.02-1.03]. The OR flattened with higher cigarette use. Associations were similar in males and females. Sensitivity analyses supported these results. Conclusions A linear dose-response relationship of maternal smoking was observed in the range of 1-15 cigarettes per day equally in boys and girls with no further risk increase for doses above 15 cigarettes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41366-018-0050-0

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A meta-analysis of 26 studies (n=238,340 mother-child pairs) found an overall increased OR for offspring exposed to maternal smoking during pregnancy being overweight or obese (OR=1.26; 95% CI = [1.22-1.29]).

    “They found an overall increased ORs in offspring exposed to maternal smoking during pregnancy compared with offspring of mothers who did not smoke being overweight or obese (OR = 1.26; 95% CI = [1.22–1.29]).”

    From Prenatal nicotine exposure during pregnancy results in adverse neurodevelopmental alterations and neurobehavioral deficits (2023) · cites this paper as [151]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The odds of a child being obese or overweight increased linearly up to 10-15 cigarettes per day, levelling out for doses higher than 15 cigarettes per day.

    “Assessing the dose-response relationship for both overweight and obesity in relation to the number of cigarettes smoked daily during pregnancy on a continuous scale, they found that the odds of a child being obese or overweight increased linearly up to 10–15 cigarettes per day, levelling out for doses higher than 15 cigarettes per day [151].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 87 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [38]Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000; 283: 2008– 12. 10789670

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Albers, L., Sobotzki, C., Kuß, O., Ajslev, T., Batista, R. F., Bettiol, H., Brabin, B., Buka, S. L., Cardoso, V. C., Clifton, V. L., Devereux, G., Gilman, S. E., Grzeskowiak, L. E., Heinrich, J., Hummel, S., Jacobsen, G. W., Jones, G., Koshy, G., Morgen, C. S., Oken, E., Paus, T., Pausova, Z., Rifas-Shiman, S. L., Sharma, A. J., da Silva, A. A., Sørensen, T. I., Thiering, E., Turner, S., Vik, T., & von Kries, R.
Affiliations
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Deutsches Diabetes-Zentrum e.V. (DE)
  • Frederiksberg Hospital (DK)
  • Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • Brown University (US)
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Helmholtz Munich (DE)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Albers, Lucia
Venue
International Journal of Obesity
Published
2018-02-28
Volume
42
Issue
7
Pages
1249-1264
ISSN
  • 0307-0565 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5497
OpenAlex
W2792151868
Cited by
57
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • LSTM Online Archive (Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • UTAS Research Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • March of Dimes Foundation
  • Wellcome Trust (102215/2/13/2), 102215)
  • University of Bristol (102215/2/13/2)
  • National Research Foundation (102215)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Danmarks Grundforskningsfond
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Augustinus Fonden
  • National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
  • Medical Research Council (102215, 102215/2/13/2)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (102215/2/13/2)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD034568)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R37HD034568, R01HD034568)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
smoking during pregnancy, offspring obesity, dose-response relationship, number of cigarettes smoked, offspring body mass index, sex differences, prenatal tobacco exposure
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Smoking, Body Mass Index, Sex Distribution, Pregnant People, Pregnant Women, Pediatric Obesity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review