The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cortical function in elderly non-insulin dependent diabetic patients. Behavioral and electrophysiologic studies
Abstract
Neurobehavioral and electrophysiologic studies were carried out to determine the effect of diabetes mellitus on cognitive function in subjects over the age of 60 years. Forty-three non-insulin-dependent diabetic men were compared with 41 male nondiabetic age-matched controls. The diabetic patients were significantly inferior to the control group in the serial learning task and Benton's Visual Retention Test. The digit span test showed no difference between the groups. Electroencephalogram (EEG)-frequency-band analysis revealed slowing over the central cortex and reduction of alpha activity over the parietal area in diabetic patients. Acute hyperglycemia induced in healthy volunteers with the administration of 50 g of intravenous glucose did not have any effect on the dominant EEG rhythms. The checkerboard elicited P100 wave did not reveal a significant increase in latency nor were the P300 wave latencies significantly different in diabetic patients. However, a trend toward longer latencies in diabetics was evident at Fz and Cz recording sites. Acute hyperglycemia in healthy volunteers did not alter the P300 wave component. The results indicate that elderly type 2 diabetic patients have an impairment in retrieval of recently learned material with preservation of auditory attention and immediate recall. The EEG data suggest that there may be some central neural pathologic condition associated with diabetes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The cholinergic hypothesis of geriatric memory dysfunction
Bartus, R. T., Dean, R. L., Beer, B., & Lippa, A. S. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7046051 · Cited by 5,545
Cited by
Diabetes mellitus and the risk of dementia: The Rotterdam Study
Ott, A., Stolk, R. P., van Harskamp, F., Pols, H. A. P., Hofman, A., & Breteler, M. M. B. (1999) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.53.9.1937 · Cited by 2,175
Kirkman, M. S., Briscoe, V. J., Clark, N., Florez, H., Haas, L. B., Halter, J. B., Huang, E. S., Korytkowski, M. T., Munshi, M. N., Odegard, P. S., et al. (2012) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc12-1801 · Cited by 1,274
Cognitive Dysfunction and Diabetes Mellitus
Kodl, C. T., & Seaquist, E. R. (2008) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2007-0034 · Cited by 802
Risk of Dementia among Persons with Diabetes Mellitus: A Population-based Cohort Study
Leibson, C. L., Rocca, W. A., Hanson, V. A., Cha, R., Kokmen, E., O'Brien, P. C., & Palumbo, P. J. (1997) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009106 · Cited by 700
Association of diabetes mellitus and dementia, the Rotterdam study
Ott, A., Stolk, R. P., Hofman, A., van Harskamp, F., Grobbee, D. E., & Breteler, M. M. B. (1996) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s001250050588 · Cited by 677
Metadata
- Authors
- Mooradian, A. D.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association
- Published
- 1988-11-01
- Volume
- 148
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2369-2372
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4233098215
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cortical function in elderly non-insulin dependent diabetic patients. Behavioral and electrophysiologic studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.148.11.2369
- The paper
- Mooradian, A. D. (1988). Cortical function in elderly non-insulin dependent diabetic patients. Behavioral and electrophysiologic studies. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.148.11.2369
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.