Cited by 506Medication Adherence and ComplianceBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesPharmacy and Medical Practices

Predictors of Adherence With Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Therapy

Chapman, Richard H.·2005·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with comorbid hypertension and dyslipidemia are at high risk for cardiovascular disease, which can be considerably mitigated by treatment. Adherence with prescribed drug therapy is, therefore, especially important in these patients. This study was undertaken to describe the patterns and predictors of adherence with concomitant antihypertensive (AH) and lipid-lowering (LL) therapy. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study examined 8406 enrollees in a US managed care plan who initiated treatment with AH and LL therapy within a 90-day period. Adherence was measured as the proportion of days covered in each 3-month interval following initiation of concomitant therapy (mean follow-up, 12.9 months). Patients were considered adherent if they had filled prescriptions sufficient to cover at least 80% of days with both classes of medications. A multivariate regression model evaluated potential predictors of adherence. RESULTS: The percentage of patients adherent with both AH and LL therapy declined sharply following treatment initiation, with 44.7%, 35.9%, and 35.8% of patients adherent at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. After adjustment for age, sex, and other potential predictors, patients were more likely to be adherent if they initiated AH and LL therapy together, had a history of coronary heart disease or congestive heart failure, or took fewer other medications. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence with concomitant AH and LL therapy is poor, with only 1 in 3 patients adherent with both medications at 6 months. Physicians may be able to significantly improve adherence by initiating AH and LL therapy concomitantly and by reducing pill burden.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinte.165.10.1147

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The proportion of individuals compliant (≥80% adherence) with lipid-lowering or antihypertensive drugs typically ranges from 65% to 85% in clinical trials to <50% in clinical practice.

    “The proportion of individuals compliant (Ն80% adherence) with lipid-lowering or antihypertensive drugs typically ranges from 65% to 85% in clinical trials to Ͻ50% in clinical practice.106 -108”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chapman, R. H.
Corresponding author
Chapman, Richard H.
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
2005-05-23
Volume
165
Issue
10
Pages
1147
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019171072
Cited by
506
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 24
FWCI
27.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
Keywords
medication adherence, antihypertensive therapy, lipid-lowering therapy, hypertension, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular disease prevention, medication burden, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, managed care enrollees, predictors of adherence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antihypertensive Agents, Hypolipidemic Agents, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hyperlipidemias, Hypertension, Male, Managed Care Programs, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Physician-Patient Relations, Predictive Value of Tests, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, United States, Multivariate Analysis, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review