Cited by 280Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthMuscle and Compartmental DisordersPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions

Outcomes in 45 Patients With Statin-Associated Myopathy

Hansen, Karen E., Hildebrand, Julie P., Ferguson, Edwin E., Stein, James H.·2005·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background Published studies regarding statin-associated myopathy may describe more dramatic patient presentations, potentially leading to inaccurate characterization of the condition. Furthermore, long-term outcomes and responses to statin rechallenge in patients with statin-associated myopathy are largely unknown. Methods The University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics Medical Informatics Department identified 437 patients with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes potentially representing cases of statin-associated myopathy from more than 13 years of inpatient and outpatient data; 45 of these individuals were diagnosed as having statin-associated myopathy. Using a standardized form, 2 researchers abstracted all the case records to define the clinical course of statin-induced myopathy. Results The mean (SD) duration of statin therapy before symptom onset was 6.3 (9.8) months. Resolution of muscle pain occurred a mean (SD) of 2.3 (3.0) months after discontinuation of statin therapy. Six patients (13%) were hospitalized for the management of rhabdomyolysis; 2 had reversible renal dysfunction, and 1 with preexisting renal insufficiency subsequently began lifelong dialysis. Hospitalized patients developed myopathy more quickly after initiating statin therapy (1.3 vs 7.1 months; P = .048) and were more likely to be taking concomitant medications known to increase the risk of statin-associated myopathy (P = .03). Thirty-seven patients received another st…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinte.165.22.2671

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hansen, K. E., Hildebrand, J. P., Ferguson, E. E., & Stein, J. H.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
2005-12-12
Volume
165
Issue
22
Pages
2671
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160936671
Cited by
280
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 11
FWCI
13.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (K23AR050995)
  • National Center for Research Resources (K12RR017614, K23 RR16176-01, K23RR016176)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Muscle and Compartmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Keywords
statin-induced myopathy, rhabdomyolysis, statin rechallenge, myalgia, long-term outcomes, drug discontinuation, concomitant medications, renal dysfunction, dialysis, hospitalization
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Hypolipidemic Agents, Creatine Kinase, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Muscular Diseases, Pain, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Rhabdomyolysis, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Recovery of Function, Renal Insufficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review