Cited by 359Obesity, Physical Activity, DietDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsCancer Risks and Factors

Waist Circumference and All-Cause Mortality in a Large US Cohort

Jacobs, Eric J.·2010·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Waist circumference (WC), a measure of abdominal obesity, is associated with higher mortality independent of body mass index (BMI). Less is known about the association between WC and mortality within categories of BMI or for the very high levels of WC that are now common. METHODS: We examined the association between WC and mortality among 48,500 men and 56,343 women, 50 years or older, in the Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort. A total of 9315 men and 5332 women died between 1997 and the end of follow-up in 2006. RESULTS: After adjustment for BMI and other risk factors, very high levels of WC were associated with an approximately 2-fold higher risk of mortality in men and women (among men, relative risk [RR]=2.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.71-2.39 for WC>or=120 cm compared with <90 cm; among women, RR=2.36; 95% CI, 1.98-2.82 for WC>or=110 cm compared with <75 cm). The WC was positively associated with mortality within all categories of BMI. In men, a 10-cm increase in WC was associated with RRs of 1.16 (95% CI, 1.09-1.23), 1.18 (95% CI, 1.12-1.24), and 1.21 (95% CI, 1.13-1.30) within normal (18.5 to <25), overweight (25 to <30), and obese (>or=30) BMI categories, respectively. In women, corresponding RRs were 1.25 (95% CI, 1.18-1.32), 1.15 (95% CI, 1.08-1.22), and 1.13 (95% CI, 1.06-1.20). CONCLUSION: These results emphasize the importance of WC as a risk factor for mortality in older adults, regardless of BMI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.201

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jacobs, E. J.
Affiliations
American Cancer Society (US)
Corresponding author
Jacobs, Eric J.
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
2010-08-09
Volume
170
Issue
15
Pages
1293
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2146683320
Cited by
359
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 28
FWCI
28.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
Keywords
waist circumference, abdominal obesity, all-cause mortality, body mass index, older adults, sex differences, mortality risk factors, Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort
MeSH terms
Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research Design, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, United States, Cohort Studies, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Body Mass Index, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Waist Circumference, Obesity, Abdominal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review