Cited by 833Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsObesity, Physical Activity, DietCancer Risks and Factors

Body fat distribution and risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women. The Nurses’ Health Study

Carey, V. J., Walters, E. E., Colditz, G. A., Solomon, C. G., Willet, W. C., Rosner, B. A., Speizer, F. E., Manson, J. E.·1997·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Obesity is an established risk factor for non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Anthropometric measures of overall and central obesity as predictors of NIDDM risk have not been as well studied, especially in women. Among 43,581 women enrolled in the Nurses' Health Study who in 1986 provided waist, hip, and weight information and who were initially free from diabetes and other major chronic diseases, NIDDM incidence was followed from 1986 to 1994. After adjustment for age, family history of diabetes, smoking, exercise, and several dietary factors, the relative risk of NIDDM for the 90th percentile of body mass index (BMI) (weight (kg)/height (m)2) (BMI = 29.9) versus the 10th percentile (BMI = 20.1) was 11.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) 7.9-15.9). Controlling for BMI and other potentially confounding factors, the relative risk for the 90th percentile of waist: hip ratio (WHR) (WHR = 0.86) versus the 10th percentile (WHR = 0.70) was 3.1 (95% CI 2.3-4.1), and the relative risk for the 90th percentile of waist circumference (36.2 inches or 92 cm) versus the 10th percentile (26.2 inches or 67 cm) was 5.1 (95% CI 2.9-8.9). BMI, WHR, and waist circumference are powerful independent predictors of NIDDM in US women. Measurement of BMI and waist circumference (with or without hip circumference) are potentially useful tools for clinicians in counseling patients regarding NIDDM risk and risk reduction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009158

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carey, V. J., Walters, E. E., Colditz, G. A., Solomon, C. G., Willet, W. C., Rosner, B. A., Speizer, F. E., & Manson, J. E.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Carey, V. J.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1997-04-01
Volume
145
Issue
7
Pages
614-619
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2154904247
Cited by
827
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 48
FWCI
9.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (CA-40356)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK 46798)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, body fat distribution, abdominal obesity, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, body mass index, obesity, women, diabetes risk factors, Nurses' Health Study
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Constitution, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Obesity, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Time Factors, United States, Body Mass Index, Incidence, Multivariate Analysis, Age Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review