Cited by 443Obesity, Physical Activity, DietDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsCancer Risks and Factors

A Pooled Analysis of Waist Circumference and Mortality in 650,000 Adults

Open access
Cerhan, James R., Moore, Steven C., Jacobs, Eric J., Kitahara, Cari M., Rosenberg, Philip S., Adami, Hans-Olov, Ebbert, Jon O., English, Dallas R. +13 more·2014·Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Abstract

Objectives To assess the independent effect of waist circumference on mortality across the entire body mass index (BMI) range and to estimate the loss in life expectancy related to a higher waist circumference.Patients and methods We pooled data from 11 prospective cohort studies with 650,386 white adults aged 20 to 83 years and enrolled from January 1, 1986, through December 31, 2000. We used proportional hazards regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for the association of waist circumference with mortality.Results During a median follow-up of 9 years (maximum, 21 years), 78,268 participants died. After accounting for age, study, BMI, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and physical activity, a strong positive linear association of waist circumference with all-cause mortality was observed for men (HR, 1.52 for waist circumferences of ≥110 vs <90 cm; 95% CI, 1.45-1.59; HR, 1.07 per 5-cm increment in waist circumference; 95% CI, 1.06-1.08) and women (HR, 1.80 for waist circumferences of ≥95 vs <70 cm; 95% CI, 1.70-1.89; HR, 1.09 per 5-cm increment in waist circumference; 95% CI, 1.08-1.09). The estimated decrease in life expectancy for highest vs lowest waist circumference was approximately 3 years for men and approximately 5 years for women. The HR per 5-cm increment in waist circumference was similar for both sexes at all BMI levels from 20 to 50 kg/m(2), but it was higher at younger ages, higher for longer follow-up, and lower among male current smokers. The associations were stronger for heart and respiratory disease mortality than for cancer.Conclusions In white adults, higher waist circumference was positively associated with higher mortality at all levels of BMI from 20 to 50 kg/m(2). Waist circumference should be assessed in combination with BMI, even for those in the normal BMI range, as part of risk assessment for obesity-related premature mortality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.11.011

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cerhan, J. R., Moore, S. C., Jacobs, E. J., Kitahara, C. M., Rosenberg, P. S., Adami, H.-O., Ebbert, J. O., English, D. R., Gapstur, S. M., Giles, G. G., Horn-Ross, P. L., Park, Y., Patel, A. V., Robien, K., Weiderpass, E., Willett, W. C., Wolk, A., Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, A., Hartge, P., Bernstein, L., & Berrington de Gonzalez, A.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • National Cancer Institute (US)
  • American Cancer Society (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Cancer Council Victoria (AU)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • City Of Hope National Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Cerhan, James R.
Venue
Mayo Clinic Proceedings
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-03
Volume
89
Issue
3
Pages
335-345
ISSN
0025-6196 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049966070
Cited by
443
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 13
FWCI
31.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mayo Clinic Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA077398, CA 77398, R01CA098661, R01CA039742, P01CA055075, P30CA016087)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES-000260, P30ES000260)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
Keywords
waist circumference, all-cause mortality, body mass index, abdominal obesity, life expectancy, sex differences, heart disease mortality, respiratory mortality, cancer mortality, smoking, White adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Life Expectancy, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Body Mass Index, Proportional Hazards Models, Risk Assessment, White People, Waist Circumference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review