Cited by 84Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Effect of Antihypertensive Therapy on Cognitive Function in Early Executive Cognitive Impairment: A Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Hajjar, Ihab, Hart, Meaghan, Chen, Yu-Ling, Mack, Wendy, Milberg, William, Chui, Helena, Lipsitz, Lewis·2012·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Do Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Really Hold Promise for the Improvement of Cognitive Functioning?—Reply

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1391

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ACEIs and ARBs may preserve cognitive function in hypertensive populations.

    “Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may improve cerebral hemodynamics185 and endothelial function186, and preserve cognitive function in hypertensive populations187.”

    From Mechanisms and treatment of late-life depression (2019) · cites this paper as [187]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hajjar, I., Hart, M., Chen, Y.-L., Mack, W., Milberg, W., Chui, H., & Lipsitz, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Hebrew SeniorLife (US)
  • Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Department of Neurology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
2012-03-12
Volume
172
Issue
5
Pages
442
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2141176548
Cited by
84
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5ul1rr031986-02, UL1TR000130)
  • National Institute on Aging (R37AG025037, P01AG004390, K23AG030057)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1-RR031986)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
antihypertensive therapy, cognitive function, executive function, cognitive impairment, angiotensin receptor blockers, hypertension, drug effects on cognition
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Benzimidazoles, Biphenyl Compounds, Blood Pressure Determination, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hydrochlorothiazide, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Tetrazoles, Treatment Outcome, Lisinopril

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review