Cited by 643Olfactory and Sensory Function StudiesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Olfaction in Neurodegenerative Disease: A Meta-analysis of Olfactory Functioning in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Diseases

Mesholam, Raquelle I., Moberg, Paul J., Mahr, Richard N., Doty, Richard L.·1998·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Olfactory deficits in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) have been well established. OBJECTIVE: To clarify and review the literature by evaluating the evidence for olfactory deficits in 3 olfactory domains, including odor identification, recognition, and detection threshold. DATA SOURCES: A literature search of English-language studies of olfaction in AD, PD, and healthy controls was conducted via online databases (PsycInfo and MEDLINE) and reference lists from review articles. STUDY SELECTION: To meet selection criteria for meta-analysis, each study required a control group and complete and usable data. This review yielded 26 publications of olfactory identification, recognition, and/or detection threshold. Because of the inclusion of more than 1 relevant study of olfaction in several of these publications (eg, both identification and threshold assessed), 43 studies were ultimately appropriate for meta-analysis. DATA EXTRACTION: Effect sizes were calculated for each study by expressing differences between patient and control group means in SD units (Cohen's d). DATA SYNTHESIS: Extremely large effect sizes were shown across all tasks in both AD and PD groups. Both between-group analyses using the Mann-Whitney U test and within-group analyses using Friedman 2-way analysis of variance did not reveal any significant differences (all P > .30). CONCLUSIONS: As expected, severe deficits were found for both patients with AD and PD in each of the 3 olfactory domains relative to controls. However, no discriminating olfactory deficits were seen between patient groups or among the 3 measured olfactory domains, suggesting a similar disturbance in olfactory function between patients with AD and PD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.55.1.84

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mesholam, R. I., Moberg, P. J., Mahr, R. N., & Doty, R. L.
Affiliations
Drexel University (US)
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
1998-01-01
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
84
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044400428
Cited by
643
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 34
FWCI
6.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (P01 DC00161, P01DC000161)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
olfaction, olfactory dysfunction, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, odor identification, odor recognition, odor detection threshold, neurodegenerative diseases
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Smell, Effect Modifier, Epidemiologic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review