Cited by 35Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research

A meta-analysis of neuropsychological, social cognitive, and olfactory functioning in the behavioral and language variants of frontotemporal dementia

Kamath, Vidyulata, Chaney, Grace-Anna S., DeRight, Jonathan, Onyike, Chiadi U.·2019·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background: Though meta-analyses of neuropsychological and social cognitive deficits in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) have been conducted, no study has comprehensively characterized and compared the neuropsychological, social cognitive, and olfactory profiles in the behavioral and language variants of FTD. Methods: Our search yielded 470 publications meeting inclusion criteria representing 11 782 FTD patients and 19 451 controls. For each domain, we calculated Hedges’ g effect sizes, which represent the mean difference between the patient and control group divided by the pooled standard deviation. The heterogeneity of these effects was assessed with Cochran's Q-statistic using a random-effects model. Meta-regressions were employed to analyze the influence of demographic and disease characteristics. Results: Though semantic variant primary progressive aphasia patients showed the greatest impairment across all task types, the three groups showed similar cognitive effect sizes once contributions from the language subdomain were excluded from analysis. Contrary to expectation, the magnitude of deficits in executive functioning, social cognition and olfaction were comparable between the three subgroups. Among indices, a metric of executive errors distinguished the behavioral variant of FTD from the language phenotypes. Conclusions: These data indicate that social cognitive and traditional executive functioning measures may not capture differences between FTD syndromes. These results have important implications for the interpretation of neuropsychological assessments, particularly when applied to the differential diagnosis of FTD. It is hoped that these findings will guide clinical and research assessments and spur new studies focused on improving the measurement of FTD syndromes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291718003604

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kamath, V., Chaney, G.-A. S., DeRight, J., & Onyike, C. U.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Kamath, Vidyulata
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2018-12-06
Volume
49
Issue
16
Pages
2669-2680
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2904209082
Cited by
35
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (KL2TR001077)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Keywords
frontotemporal dementia, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, semantic dementia, neuropsychological deficits, social cognition, olfactory dysfunction, executive function, differential diagnosis, effect size
MeSH terms
Aged, Agnosia, Aphasia, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Social Behavior, Executive Function, Emotional Intelligence, Frontotemporal Dementia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review