Cited by 54Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Long-term Effects of Bilateral Frontal Brain Lesion: 60 Years After Injury With an Iron Bar

Mataró, Maria, Jurado, M. Ángeles, García-Sánchez, Carmen, Barraquer, Lluis, Costa-Jussà, Frederic R., Junqué, Carme·2001·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

Background Harlow's report of the case of Phineas P. Gage in 1848 was one of the earliest description of the personality and behavioral changes following frontal lobe damage. Since Harlow's articles, a few more case reports of frontal lobe damage have been published. As standard neuropsychological and neurologic evaluations may reveal subtle defects, case reports have been particularly useful in characterizing the behavioral changes that follow frontal lobe damage. Objective To describe the long-term outcome of an 81-year-old patient who sustained a severe frontal brain lesion 60 years ago caused by the passage of an iron spike through his head. Results The patient has bilateral damage affecting the orbital and dorsolateral frontal regions. He displays many of the typical frontal behavioral disturbances described in the literature. His conduct is characterized by dependence on others, cheerfulness, planning difficulties, problems establishing realistic goals, lack of drive, and difficulties in initiating, continuing, and finishing activities. Although gross cognitive functioning is intact, neuropsychological deficits are present in the executive functioning, memory, and visuoconstructive domains. Conclusions In contrast with the antisocial conduct pattern usually associated with frontal damage in the literature, this case suggests that large frontal lesions can produce behavioral and personality changes that are compatible with stable functioning in family, professional, and…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.58.7.1139

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A patient with frontal lobe injury from an iron spike had difficulty planning, became more irritable, and had problems regulating emotions.

    “For example, Mataró, Jurado, García-Sánchez et al. [2001] describe the behavior of a Spanish patient whose head was impaled by an iron spike, injuring both frontal lobes.Like Phineas Gage, his behavior changed.After the accident, he had difficulty planning, became more irritable, and had problems regulating emotions.”

    From Personality Psychology and Economics (2011) · cites this paper as Mataró, Jurado, García-Sánchez et al. [2001]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mataró, M., Jurado, M. Á., García-Sánchez, C., Barraquer, L., Costa-Jussà, F. R., & Junqué, C.
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
2001-07-01
Volume
58
Issue
7
Pages
1139
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029638188
Cited by
54
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
frontal lobe damage, long-term outcomes, personality change, executive dysfunction, memory impairment, antisocial behavior, Phineas Gage, elderly patients
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Aged, Brain Injuries, Cognition Disorders, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Personality, Wechsler Scales, Head Injuries, Penetrating

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review