Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 184

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diffusion Tensor Tractography of Traumatic Diffuse Axonal Injury

Wang, Jun Yi, Bakhadirov, Khamid, Devous, Michael D., Abdi, Hervé, McColl, Roddy, Moore, Carol, Marquez de la Plata, Carlos D., Ding, Kan, Whittemore, Anthony, Babcock, Evelyn, Rickbeil, Tiffany, Dobervich, Julia, Kroll, David, Dao, Bao, Mohindra, Nisha, Madden, Christopher J., Diaz-Arrastia, Ramon·2008·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diffuse axonal injury is a common consequence of traumatic brain injury that frequently involves the parasagittal white matter, corpus callosum, and brainstem. OBJECTIVE: To examine the potential of diffusion tensor tractography in detecting diffuse axonal injury at the acute stage of injury and predicting long-term functional outcome. DESIGN: Tract-derived fiber variables were analyzed to distinguish patients from control subjects and to determine their relationship to outcome. SETTING: Inpatient traumatic brain injury unit. PATIENTS: From 2005 to 2006, magnetic resonance images were acquired in 12 patients approximately 7 days after injury and in 12 age- and sex-matched controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Six fiber variables of the corpus callosum, fornix, and peduncular projections were obtained. Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended scores were assessed approximately 9 months after injury in 11 of the 12 patients. RESULTS: At least 1 fiber variable of each region showed diffuse axonal injury-associated alterations. At least 1 fiber variable of the anterior body and splenium of the corpus callosum correlated significantly with the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended scores. The predicted outcome scores correlated significantly with actual scores in a mixed-effects model. CONCLUSION: Diffusion tensor tractography-based quantitative analysis at the acute stage of injury has the potential to serve as a valuable biomarker of diffuse axonal injury and predict long-term outcome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.65.5.619

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wang, J. Y., Bakhadirov, K., Devous, M. D., Abdi, H., McColl, R., Moore, C., Marquez de la Plata, C. D., Ding, K., Whittemore, A., Babcock, E., Rickbeil, T., Dobervich, J., Kroll, D., Dao, B., Mohindra, N., Madden, C. J., & Diaz-Arrastia, R.
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
2008-05-01
Volume
65
Issue
5
Pages
619-26
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160699120
Cited by
184
References
1
FWCI
13.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.