Cited by 85Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Age and Rate of Cognitive Decline in Alzheimer Disease: Implications for Clinical Trials

Bernick, Charles, Cummings, Jeffrey, Raman, Rema, Sun, Xiaoying, Aisen, Paul·2012·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Factors that affect the rate of progression of Alzheimer disease (AD) need to be considered in the clinical trial designs of potential disease-modifying therapies. OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of age on AD course in a clinical trial setting. DESIGN: Pooled cohort study from 3 AD clinical trials of 18-month duration conducted by the Alzheimer Disease Cooperative Study group. SETTING: Alzheimer disease research centers from across the United States. PATIENTS: Four hundred seventy-one subjects with mild to moderate AD assigned to the placebo arm of 3 clinical trials. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The relationships between baseline age and rate of change in the Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale–cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) 11, Mini-Mental State Examination, Clinical Dementia Rating scale Sum of Boxes score, Alzheimer Disease Cooperative Study–activities of daily living scale, and Neuropsychiatric Inventory were analyzed using a mixed-effect regression model. Sample size calculation for possible future AD clinical trials lasting 18 months using the results of the change in ADAS-cog 11 by tertiles of age groups. RESULTS: Older age at baseline was associated with a slower rate of decline in the ADAS-cog 11 and the Mini-Mental State Examination scores. Almost twice as many subjects aged 80 years and older compared with those aged younger than 70 years would be required to demonstrate a 30% treatment effect on the ADAS-cog 11 in an 18-month AD trial. CONCLUSION: Subject age is an important factor to consider when defining the study population in and analyzing data from AD trials of potential disease-modifying therapies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneurol.2011.3758

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Composite scores encompassing multiple neuropsychological tests can provide some of the most reliable assessments of global cognitive status relating to AD and serve as efficacy outcome measures in clinical trials.

    “Composite scores encompassing multiple neuropsychological tests are often used and can provide some of the most reliable assessments of global cognitive status relating to AD as well as serving as efficacy outcome measures in clinical trials (Bernick et al., 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bernick, C., Cummings, J., Raman, R., Sun, X., & Aisen, P.
Affiliations
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Lou Ruvo Brain Institute (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Bernick, Charles
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
2012-07-01
Volume
69
Issue
7
Pages
901-5
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049722644
Cited by
85
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, age effects, disease-modifying therapy, clinical trial design, sample size determination, Mini-Mental State Examination, Clinical Dementia Rating, activities of daily living, neuropsychiatric symptoms, older adults
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Antipsychotic Agents, United States, Cohort Studies, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review