Cited by 62Vitamin C and Antioxidants ResearchRespiratory viral infections researchHerbal Medicine Research Studies

Ascorbic Acid and the Common Cold: Evaluation of Its Efficacy and Toxicity

Dykes, Michael H. M.·1975·JAMA

Abstract

We reviewed the clinical data relating to the efficacy and safety of pharmacologic doses of ascorbic acid in the prevention and treatment of the common cold. Although one study tentatively supports the hypothesis that such doses of ascorbic acid may be efficacious, a second study by the same group did not confirm the significant findings, and no clear, reproducible pattern of efficacy has emerged from the review of all the evidence. Similarly, there is currently little adequate evidence on either the presence or the absence of serious adverse reactions to such doses of ascorbic acid, although many such reactions have been hypothesized. The unrestricted use of ascorbic acid for these purposes cannot be advocated on the basis of the evidence currently available. (JAMA231:1073-1079, 1975)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1975.03240220051025

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Speculation about the potential harm of large doses of vitamin C has been shown to be unfounded.

    “Although there has been speculation about the potential harm of large doses, it has been shown to be unfounded (Dykes 1975; Hemilä 2006a).”

    From Vitamin C for preventing and treating the common cold (2013) · cites this paper as Dykes 1975

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dykes, M. H. M.
Corresponding author
Dykes, Michael H. M.
Venue
JAMA
Published
1975-03-10
Volume
231
Issue
10
Pages
1073
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W4297631595
Cited by
62
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
JAMA (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Respiratory viral infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Herbal Medicine Research Studies
Keywords
vitamin C, common cold, cold prevention, cold treatment, efficacy, adverse effects, evidence review

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review