Cited by 1,241Menopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsEstrogen and related hormone effectsHormonal and reproductive studies

Estrogen and coronary heart disease in women

Barrett-Connor, Elizabeth·1991·JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association

Abstract

We review herein the evidence that estrogen is protective against the development of cardiovascular disease in women. To our knowledge, no studies in women have looked at endogenous estrogen levels as predictors of cardiovascular disease. Studies of surrogate measures of endogenous estrogen such as parity, age at menarche, and age at menopause have provided inconsistent results. Current use of oral contraceptives increases risk in older women who smoke cigarettes, but most studies of past use show no increased risk. Most, but not all, studies of hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women show around a 50% reduction in risk of a coronary event in women using unopposed oral estrogen. These important observations need to be confirmed in a double-blind, randomized clinical trial, since the protection is biologically plausible and the magnitude of the benefit would be quite large if selection factors can be excluded.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1991.03460140089033

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One included study was an observational analysis of CV events of a randomized trial evaluating electrocautery of ovaries versus gonadotropins in women with clomiphene-resistant polycystic ovarian syndrome.

    “One included study (35) was an observational analysis of CV events of a randomized trial evaluating electrocautery of ovaries versus gonadotropins in women with clomipheneresistant polycystic ovarian syndrome (36).”

    From Cardiovascular Risk Following Fertility Therapy (2017) · cites this paper as [35]

  • One included study was judged to have an overall serious risk of bias resulting from vague ascertainment and classification of CV outcomes.

    “One included study was judged to have an overall serious risk of bias resulting from vague ascertainment and classification of CV outcomes (35).”

    From Cardiovascular Risk Following Fertility Therapy (2017) · cites this paper as [35]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barrett-Connor, E.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Barrett-Connor, Elizabeth
Venue
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Published
1991-04-10
Volume
265
Issue
14
Pages
1861
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2018312028
Cited by
1,241
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 23
FWCI
31.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
Keywords
estrogen, coronary artery disease, women, cardiovascular disease, endogenous estrogen, parity, age at menarche, age at menopause, oral contraceptives, smoking, hormone replacement therapy, postmenopausal women, unopposed estrogen
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal, Coronary Disease, Estrogens, Female, Humans, Menopause, Menstruation, Parity, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Estrogen Replacement Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review