Cited by 196Cardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsElasticity and Material Modeling

Gender differences in large artery stiffness pre-and post puberty

Ahimastos, Anna A., Formosa, Melissa, Dart, Anthony M., Kingwell, Bronwyn A.·2003·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

Age-related large artery stiffening is more pronounced in women compared with men and is an important cause of isolated systolic hypertension. This study aimed to investigate whether such gender differences are inherent or the result of sex steroid influences. Healthy children prepuberty [26 female (10.3 +/- 0.1 yr), 32 male (10.3 +/- 0.1 yr), mean age +/- SD] and post puberty [30 female (15.9 +/- 0.2 yr), 22 male (15.9 +/- 0.4 yr)] were studied. Large artery stiffness was assessed globally via systemic arterial compliance and regionally via pulse wave velocity. Prepubertal males and females did not differ in body size, cardiac output, or heart rate. Prepubertal females had stiffer large arteries and higher pulse pressure than age-matched males (P < 0.05). Postpubertal males were taller and heavier and had a greater cardiac output and lower heart rate compared with similarly aged females. In relation to pubertal status, females developed more distensible large arteries post puberty whereas males developed stiffer large vessels (P < 0.05). These changes where such that central large artery stiffness was similar between genders in the postpubertal group. Together these data suggest that large artery stiffness varies intrinsically between genders but is also modulated by both male and female sex steroids.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2003-030722

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahimastos, A. A., Formosa, M., Dart, A. M., & Kingwell, B. A.
Affiliations
Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU)
Corresponding author
Kingwell, Bronwyn A.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2003-11-01
Volume
88
Issue
11
Pages
5375-5380
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2083745787
Cited by
196
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart Foundation of Australia
  • Heart Research Institute
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Elasticity and Material Modeling
Keywords
large artery stiffness, sex differences, puberty, sex steroids, pulse wave velocity, arterial compliance, pulse pressure, isolated systolic hypertension, children, adolescents, cardiac output, heart rate
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Blood Pressure, Brachial Artery, Child, Compliance, Estradiol, Female, Humans, Male, Puberty, Pulsatile Flow, Saliva, Sex Characteristics, Testosterone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review