Cited by 1,170Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Comparison of Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy and Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Wilber, David J., Pappone, Carlo, Neuzil, Petr, De Paola, Angelo, Marchlinski, Frank, Natale, Andrea, Macle, Laurent, Daoud, Emile G. +10 more·2010·JAMA

Abstract

Context Antiarrhythmic drugs are commonly used for prevention of recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) despite inconsistent efficacy and frequent adverse effects. Catheter ablation has been proposed as an alternative treatment for paroxysmal AF. Objective To determine the efficacy of catheter ablation compared with antiarrhythmic drug therapy (ADT) in treating symptomatic paroxysmal AF. Design, setting, and participants A prospective, multicenter, randomized (2:1), unblinded, Bayesian-designed study conducted at 19 hospitals of 167 patients who did not respond to at least 1 antiarrhythmic drug and who experienced at least 3 AF episodes within 6 months before randomization. Enrollment occurred between October 25, 2004, and October 11, 2007, with the last follow-up on January 19, 2009. Intervention Catheter ablation (n = 106) or ADT (n = 61), with assessment for effectiveness in a comparable 9-month follow-up period. Main outcome measures Time to protocol-defined treatment failure. The proportion of patients who experienced major treatment-related adverse events within 30 days of catheter ablation or ADT was also reported. Results At the end of the 9-month effectiveness evaluation period, 66% of patients in the catheter ablation group remained free from protocol-defined treatment failure compared with 16% of patients treated with ADT. The hazard ratio of catheter ablation to ADT was 0.30 (95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.47; P Conclusion Among patients with paroxysmal AF who had no…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2009.2029

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Catheter ablation or combination therapy is often effective when antiarrhythmic drugs fail.

    “Catheter ablation or combination therapy is often effective when antiarrhythmic drugs fail.226,[585][586][587]”
  • In patients with symptomatic paroxysmal, persistent, and probably long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation is more effective than antiarrhythmic drug therapy.

    “In such patients, catheter ablation is more effective than antiarrhythmic drug therapy.185,586,713,[717][718][719][720]”
  • Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation is effective in restoring and maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal, persistent, and probably long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation, generally as second-line treatment after failure of or intolerance to antiarrhythmic drug therapy.

    “Catheter ablation of AF is effective in restoring and maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal, persistent, and probably long-standing persistent AF -in general as second-line treatment after failure of or intolerance to antiarrhythmic drug therapy.”
  • In patients who experience symptomatic recurrences of atrial fibrillation despite antiarrhythmic drug therapy, all randomized controlled trials showed better sinus rhythm maintenance with catheter ablation than on antiarrhythmic drugs.

    “In patients who experience symptomatic recurrences of AF despite antiarrhythmic drug therapy, all RCTs showed better sinus rhythm maintenance with catheter ablation than on antiarrhythmic drugs.586,713,727,728”
  • Isthmus ablation is comparably safe and more effective than antiarrhythmic drug therapy.

    “Isthmus ablation is comparably safe and more effective than antiarrhythmic drug therapy, and is recommended for recurrent atrial flutter.[585][586][587]713”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilber, D. J., Pappone, C., Neuzil, P., De Paola, A., Marchlinski, F., Natale, A., Macle, L., Daoud, E. G., Calkins, H., Hall, B., Reddy, V., Augello, G., Reynolds, M. R., Vinekar, C., Liu, C. Y., Berry, S. M., Berry, D. A., & ThermoCool AF Trial Investigators, F. T.
Affiliations
  • Loyola University Medical Center (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Rochester (US)
  • Na Homolce Hospital (CZ)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Biosense Webster (United States) (US)
  • Berry Consultants, LLC (United States) (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2010-01-27
Volume
303
Issue
4
Pages
333
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2038456369
Cited by
1,170
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 80 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 74 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 93 · 2013: 91 · 2012: 115
FWCI
71.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNIFESP Institutional Repository (Universidade Federal de São Paulo) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P30CA016672)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, radiofrequency catheter ablation, antiarrhythmic drugs, treatment failure, treatment-related adverse events, quality of life, refractory atrial fibrillation, treatment efficacy comparison, 30-day complications, quality-adjusted survival
MeSH terms
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Atrial Fibrillation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Catheter Ablation, Treatment Failure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review