Cited by 316Cardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsHealthcare Systems and Public HealthHealth disparities and outcomes

Association of Race and Sex With Risk of Incident Acute Coronary Heart Disease Events

Open access
Safford, Monika M., Brown, Todd M., Muntner, Paul M., Durant, Raegan W., Glasser, Stephen, Halanych, Jewell H., Shikany, James M., Prineas, Ronald J. +8 more·2012·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: It is unknown whether long-standing disparities in incidence of coronary heart disease (CHD) among US blacks and whites persist. OBJECTIVE: To examine incident CHD by black and white race and by sex. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective cohort study of 24,443 participants without CHD at baseline from the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) cohort, who resided in the continental United States and were enrolled between 2003 and 2007 with follow-up through December 31, 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Expert-adjudicated total (fatal and nonfatal) CHD, fatal CHD, and nonfatal CHD (definite or probable myocardial infarction [MI]; very small non-ST-elevation MI [NSTEMI] had peak troponin level <0.5 μg/L). RESULTS: Over a mean (SD) of 4.2 (1.5) years of follow-up, 659 incident CHD events occurred (153 in black men, 138 in black women, 254 in white men, and 114 in white women). Among men, the age-standardized incidence rate per 1000 person-years for total CHD was 9.0 (95% CI, 7.5-10.8) for blacks vs 8.1 (95% CI, 6.9-9.4) for whites; fatal CHD: 4.0 (95% CI, 2.9-5.3) vs 1.9 (95% CI, 1.4-2.6), respectively; and nonfatal CHD: 4.9 (95% CI, 3.8-6.2) vs 6.2 (95% CI, 5.2-7.4). Among women, the age-standardized incidence rate per 1000 person-years for total CHD was 5.0 (95% CI, 4.2-6.1) for blacks vs 3.4 (95% CI, 2.8-4.2) for whites; fatal CHD: 2.0 (95% CI, 1.5-2.7) vs 1.0 (95% CI, 0.7-1.5), respectively; and nonfatal CHD: 2.8 (95% CI, 2.2-3.7) vs 2.2 (95% CI, 1.7-2.9). Age- and region-adjusted hazard ratios for fatal CHD among blacks vs whites was near 2.0 for both men and women and became statistically nonsignificant after multivariable adjustment. The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio for incident nonfatal CHD for blacks vs whites was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.51-0.91) for men and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.58-1.15) for women. Of the 444 nonfatal CHD events, 139 participants (31.3%) had very small NSTEMIs. CONCLUSIONS: The higher risk of fatal CHD among blacks compared with whites was associated with cardiovascular disease risk factor burden. These relationships may differ by sex.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2012.14306

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Black Americans are more likely to smoke cigarettes and less likely to quit cigarette smoking compared with NHW, with high rates of menthol cigarette use.

    “Black Americans are also more likely to smoke cigarettes and less likely to quit cigarette smoking compared with NHW with high rates of menthol cigarette use supporting current plans to regulate menthol tobacco products.32,33”

    From Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Peripheral Artery Disease (2021) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Results, under Sample Characteristics (page not provided), say smoking was more prevalent among Black than white participants, supporting the smoking comparison. The paper does not report racial differences in quitting or menthol cigarette use; its Methods, under Covariates (page not provided), define current smoking but do not address either point. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Safford, M. M., Brown, T. M., Muntner, P. M., Durant, R. W., Glasser, S., Halanych, J. H., Shikany, J. M., Prineas, R. J., Samdarshi, T., Bittner, V. A., Lewis, C. E., Gamboa, C., Cushman, M., Howard, V., Howard, G., & REGARDS Investigators, F. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • University of Vermont (US)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2012-11-07
Volume
308
Issue
17
Pages
1768
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2035962722
Cited by
316
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 3
FWCI
14.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL080477, K24HL111154)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U01NS041588)
  • National Center for Research Resources (KL2RR025776)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Healthcare Systems and Public Health
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
acute coronary heart disease, racial disparities, sex differences, black-white disparities, myocardial infarction, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, coronary heart disease mortality, REGARDS cohort, coronary heart disease incidence
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Black or African American, Coronary Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Risk, Sex Factors, United States, Incidence, Black People, White People, Health Status Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review