Cited by 44Sleep and Work-Related FatigueHospital Admissions and OutcomesHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout

Effect of a Protected Sleep Period on Hours Slept During Extended Overnight In-hospital Duty Hours Among Medical Interns: A Randomized Trial

Open access
Volpp, Kevin G., Shea, Judy A., Small, Dylan S., Basner, Mathias, Zhu, Jingsan, Norton, Laurie, Ecker, Adrian, Novak, Cristina +4 more·2012·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: A 2009 Institute of Medicine report recommended protected sleep periods for medicine trainees on extended overnight shifts, a position reinforced by new Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and consequences of protected sleep periods during extended duty. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized controlled trial conducted at the Philadelphia VA Medical Center medical service and Oncology Unit of the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (2009-2010). Of the 106 interns and senior medical students who consented, 3 were not scheduled on any study rotations. Among the others, 44 worked at the VA center, 16 at the university hospital, and 43 at both. INTERVENTION: Twelve 4-week blocks were randomly assigned to either a standard intern schedule (extended duty overnight shifts of up to 30 hours; equivalent to 1200 overnight intern shifts at each site), or a protected sleep period (protected time from 12:30 AM to 5:30 AM with handover of work cell phone; equivalent to 1200 overnight intern shifts at each site). Participants were asked to wear wrist actigraphs and complete sleep diaries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was hours slept during the protected period on extended duty overnight shifts. Secondary outcome measures included hours slept during a 24-hour period (noon to noon) by day of call cycle and Karolinska sleepiness scale. RESULTS: For 98.3% of on-call nights, cell phones were signed out as designed. At the VA center, participants with protected sleep had a mean 2.86 hours (95% CI, 2.57-3.10 hours) of sleep vs 1.98 hours (95% CI, 1.68-2.28 hours) among those who did not have protected hours of sleep (P < .001). At the university hospital, participants with protected sleep had a mean 3.04 hours (95% CI, 2.77-3.45 hours) of sleep vs 2.04 hours (95% CI, 1.79-2.24) among those who did not have protected sleep (P < .001). Participants with protected sleep were significantly less likely to have call nights with no sleep: 5.8% (95% CI, 3.0%-8.5%) vs 18.6% (95% CI, 13.9%-23.2%) at the VA center (P < .001) and 5.9% (95% CI, 3.1%-8.7%) vs 14.2% (95% CI, 9.9%-18.4%) at the university hospital (P = .001). Participants felt less sleepy after on-call nights in the intervention group, with Karolinska sleepiness scale scores of 6.65 (95% CI, 6.35-6.97) vs 7.10 (95% CI, 6.85-7.33; P = .01) at the VA center and 5.91 (95% CI, 5.64-6.16) vs 6.79 (95% CI, 6.57-7.04; P < .001) at the university hospital. CONCLUSIONS: For internal medicine services at 2 hospitals, implementation of a protected sleep period while on call resulted in an increase in overnight sleep duration and improved alertness the next morning. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00874510.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2012.34490

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1]Common program requirements for duty hours: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education http://www.ama-assn.org/resources/doc/rfs/dutyhours.pdf. February 11, 2003 Accessed November 1, 2012.
  2. [26]Rosekind MR Neri DF Dinges DF From laboratory to flightdeck: promoting operational alertness Fatigue and Duty Limitations—An International Review Proceedings of The Royal Aeronautical Society London, England 1997 7.1 7.14

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Volpp, K. G., Shea, J. A., Small, D. S., Basner, M., Zhu, J., Norton, L., Ecker, A., Novak, C., Bellini, L. M., Dine, C. J., Mollicone, D. J., & Dinges, D. F.
Affiliations
Philadelphia VA Medical Center (US)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2012-12-05
Volume
308
Issue
21
Pages
2208
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2083569689
Cited by
44
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Nursing Research (NR004281, R01NR004281)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Keywords
medical interns, sleep deprivation, sleep duration, sleepiness, Karolinska Sleepiness Scale, graduate medical education, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, medical students, actigraphy, sleep diary, physician well-being
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Hospitals, University, Hospitals, Veterans, Humans, Internship and Residency, Male, Personnel Staffing and Scheduling, Sleep, Students, Medical, Time Factors, Philadelphia, Workload, Cell Phone, Young Adult, Actigraphy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review