Cited by 14Sleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and Wakefulness ResearchMind wandering and attention

Using a Single Daytime Performance Test to Identify Most Individuals at High-Risk for Performance Impairment during Extended Wake

Open access
St. Hilaire, Melissa A., Kristal, Bruce S., Rahman, Shadab A., Sullivan, Jason P., Quackenbush, John, Duffy, Jeanne F., Barger, Laura K., Gooley, Joshua J. +2 more·2019·Scientific Reports

Abstract

We explored the predictive value of a neurobehavioral performance assessment under rested baseline conditions (evaluated at 8 hours awake following 8 hours of sleep) on neurobehavioral response to moderate sleep loss (evaluated at 20 hours awake two days later) in 151 healthy young participants (18–30 years). We defined each participant’s response-to-sleep-loss phenotype based on the number of attentional failures on a 10-min visual psychomotor vigilance task taken at 20 hours awake (resilient: less than 6 attentional failures, n = 26 participants; non-resilient: 6 or more attentional failures, n = 125 participants). We observed that 97% of rested participants with 2 or more attentional failures (n = 73 of 151) and 100% of rested participants with 3 or more attentional failures (n = 57 of 151) were non-resilient after moderate sleep loss. Our approach can accurately identify a significant proportion of individuals who are at high risk for neurobehavioral performance impairment from staying up late with a single neurobehavioral performance assessment conducted during rested conditions. Additional methods are needed to predict the future performance of individuals who are not identified as high risk during baseline.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-019-52930-y

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [26]Jones, J. M. In Gallup Poll Social Series: Lifestyle. (Gallup News Service, Princeton, 2013), vol. 2016.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
St. Hilaire, M. A., Kristal, B. S., Rahman, S. A., Sullivan, J. P., Quackenbush, J., Duffy, J. F., Barger, L. K., Gooley, J. J., Czeisler, C. A., & Lockley, S. W.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2019-11-13
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
16681-16681
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2984514791
Cited by
14
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX14AK53G, NCC9-119)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (5R01HL111759)
  • National Space Biomedical Research Institute (HPF01301)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH45130)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS36590)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Center for Research Resources (M01RR02635, UL1RR025758)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
Keywords
sleep deprivation, neurobehavioral performance, psychomotor vigilance task, attentional failures, extended wakefulness, high-risk identification
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Circadian Rhythm, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Rest, Sleep, Sleep Deprivation, Wakefulness, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review