Cited by 466Sleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and Wakefulness ResearchMind wandering and attention

Validity and sensitivity of a brief psychomotor vigilance test (PVT-B) to total and partial sleep deprivation

Open access
Basner, Mathias, Mollicone, Daniel, Dinges, David F.·2011·Acta Astronautica

Abstract

The Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT) objectively assesses fatigue-related changes in alertness associated with sleep loss, extended wakefulness, circadian misalignment, and time on task. The standard 10-min PVT is often considered impractical in applied contexts. To address this limitation, we developed a modified brief 3-min version of the PVT (PVT-B). The PVT-B was validated in controlled laboratory studies with 74 healthy subjects (34 female, aged 22-45 years) that participated either in a total sleep deprivation (TSD) study involving 33 hours awake (N=31 subjects) or in a partial sleep deprivation (PSD) protocol involving 5 consecutive nights of 4 hours time in bed (N=43 subjects). PVT and PVT-B were performed regularly during wakefulness. Effect sizes of 5 key PVT outcomes were larger for TSD than PSD and larger for PVT than for PVT-B for all outcomes. Effect size was largest for response speed (reciprocal response time) for both the PVT-B and the PVT in both TSD and PSD. According to Cohen's criteria, effect sizes for the PVT-B were still large (TSD) or medium to large (PSD, except for fastest 10% RT). Compared to the 70% decrease in test duration the 22.7% (range 6.9%-67.8%) average decrease in effect size was deemed an acceptable trade-off between duration and sensitivity. Overall, PVT-B performance had faster response times, more false starts and fewer lapses than PVT performance (all p<0.01). After reducing the lapse threshold from 500 ms to 355 ms for PVT-B, mixed model ANOVAs indicated no differential sensitivity to sleep loss between PVT-B and PVT for all outcome variables (all P>0.15) but the fastest 10% response times during PSD (P<0.001), and effect sizes increased from 1.38 to 1.49 (TSD) and 0.65 to 0.76 (PSD), respectively. In conclusion, PVT-B tracked standard 10-min PVT performance throughout both TSD and PSD, and yielded medium to large effect sizes. PVT-B may be a useful tool for assessing behavioral alertness in settings where the duration of the 10-min PVT is considered impractical, although further validation in applied settings is needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.07.015

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The PVT-B is a validated measure of vigilant attention stability based on simple reaction time to visual stimuli.

    “The PVT-B is a validated measure of the stability of vigilant attention that is based on simple reaction time to visual stimuli occurring at random intervals”
  • Vigilant attention performance and psychomotor speed, as assessed with the PVT, are affected early and progressively more severely by sleep deprivation.

    “Vigilant attention performance and psychomotor speed, as assessed with the PVT, are affected early and progressively more severely by sleep deprivation.86,166”

    From Circadian rhythms, sleep deprivation, and human performance (2013) · cites this paper as [166]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Basner, M., Mollicone, D., & Dinges, D. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Pulsar Informatics (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Basner, Mathias
Venue
Acta Astronautica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
69
Issue
11-12
Pages
949-959
ISSN
0094-5765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986895837
Cited by
466
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
10.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Astronautica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000003)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR004281)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000040, UL1RR024134)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
Keywords
psychomotor vigilance test, total sleep deprivation, sleep restriction, alertness, fatigue, reaction time (psychology), false starts, lapses, test time reduction, circadian misalignment, extended wakefulness, time in bed, test validation, effect size, time on task, shift work

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review