Cited by 506Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

Effect of Oral Semaglutide Compared With Placebo and Subcutaneous Semaglutide on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Davies, Melanie, Pieber, Thomas R., Hartoft-Nielsen, Marie-Louise, Hansen, Oluf K. H., Jabbour, Serge, Rosenstock, Julio·2017·JAMA

Abstract

Importance: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are effective therapies for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and are all currently available as an injection. Objectives: To compare the effects of oral semaglutide with placebo (primary) and open-label subcutaneous semaglutide (secondary) on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Design, Setting, and Patients: Phase 2, randomized, parallel-group, dosage-finding, 26-week trial with 5-week follow-up at 100 sites (hospital clinics, general practices, and clinical research centers) in 14 countries conducted between December 2013 and December 2014. Of 1106 participants assessed, 632 with type 2 diabetes and insufficient glycemic control using diet and exercise alone or a stable dose of metformin were randomized. Randomization was stratified by metformin use. Interventions: Once-daily oral semaglutide of 2.5 mg (n = 70), 5 mg (n = 70), 10 mg (n = 70), 20 mg (n = 70), 40-mg 4-week dose escalation (standard escalation; n = 71), 40-mg 8-week dose escalation (slow escalation; n = 70), 40-mg 2-week dose escalation (fast escalation, n = 70), oral placebo (n = 71; double-blind) or once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide of 1.0 mg (n = 70) for 26 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline to week 26. Secondary end points included change from baseline in body weight and adverse events. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable across treatment groups. Of the 632 randomized patients (mean age, 57.1 years [SD, 10.6]; men, 395 (62.7%); diabetes duration, 6.3 years [SD, 5.2]; body weight, 92.3 kg [SD, 16.8]; BMI, 31.7 [SD, 4.3]), 583 (92%) completed the trial. Mean change in HbA1c level from baseline to week 26 decreased with oral semaglutide (dosage-dependent range, -0.7% to -1.9%) and subcutaneous semaglutide (-1.9%) and placebo (-0.3%); oral semaglutide reductions were significant vs placebo (dosage-dependent estimated treatment difference [ETD] range for oral semaglutide vs placebo, -0.4% to -1.6%; P = .01 for 2.5 mg, <.001 for all other dosages). Reductions in body weight were greater with oral semaglutide (dosage-dependent range, -2.1 kg to -6.9 kg) and subcutaneous semaglutide (-6.4 kg) vs placebo (-1.2 kg), and significant for oral semaglutide dosages of 10 mg or more vs placebo (dosage-dependent ETD range, -0.9 to -5.7 kg; P < .001). Adverse events were reported by 63% to 86% (371 of 490 patients) in the oral semaglutide groups, 81% (56 of 69 patients) in the subcutaneous semaglutide group, and 68% (48 of 71 patients) in the placebo group; mild to moderate gastrointestinal events were most common. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with type 2 diabetes, oral semaglutide resulted in better glycemic control than placebo over 26 weeks. These findings support phase 3 studies to assess longer-term and clinical outcomes, as well as safety. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01923181.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2017.14752

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a phase 2 study, 77% of patients experienced GI adverse effects with a fast 2-week dose escalation to 40 mg compared with 54% in the slower 8-week dose-escalation group.

    “As a clear example in the abovementioned phase 2 study (38), 77% of patients experienced GI adverse effects when a fast 2-week dose escalation was used to reach 40 mg compared with 54% in the slower 8-week dose-escalation group.”

    From Safety of Semaglutide (2021) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Trial Design section describes a phase 2 study comparing 2-week fast and 8-week slow escalation to 40 mg. The Adverse Events section reports GI-event rates as high as 77% with oral semaglutide, but does not assign 77% to the fast-escalation group or 54% to the slow-escalation group; its explicit 54% figure is for subcutaneous semaglutide. It describes GI-event proportions across the three 40-mg escalation groups as similar. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • When comparing oral semaglutide 20 mg to subcutaneous semaglutide 1 mg, total gastrointestinal disturbances were similar (56% vs 54%).

    “When comparing oral 20 mg to subcutaneous 1 mg, the total amount of gastrointestinal disturbances was similar (56% versus 54%, respectively).”

    From Safety of Semaglutide (2021) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Adverse Events section reports gastrointestinal events in 54% of the subcutaneous semaglutide group and says the adverse-event profiles of oral and subcutaneous semaglutide were comparable. Our copy does not establish the claimed 56% rate specifically for the oral 20-mg group; the section gives only a 31%–77% range across oral doses, and the retrieved Table 3 text does not resolve that dose-specific figure. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Oral semaglutide 14 mg/d produced a weight reduction of -5.3% compared with -1.3% for placebo after 26 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes.

    “Semaglutide (PO) [14 mg/d for 30 days] Treatment À5.3% (À5.0 kg) vs. placebo À1.3% (À1.2 kg) [after 20 mg OD for 26 weeks, in patients with T2DM] [23]”

    From Estimated minimum prices and lowest available national prices for antiobesity medications: Improving affordability and access to treatment (2023) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Body Weight section reports greater weight loss with oral semaglutide than placebo at week 26 in patients with type 2 diabetes. It does not report a 14-mg/day group or the claimed −5.3% versus −1.3% changes; its −5.0 kg figure for the 20-mg group is an estimated difference from placebo, not that group's weight change. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The proportion of patients with premature discontinuation because of adverse events was higher for oral semaglutide 20 mg (27%) than for subcutaneous semaglutide 1 mg (14%).

    “The proportion of patients with premature discontinuation because of adverse events appeared higher for oral semaglutide 20 mg (27%) than for subcutaneous semaglutide 1 mg (14%).”

    From Safety of Semaglutide (2021) · cites this paper as [38]

  • In a 26-week randomized controlled trial, oral semaglutide dose-dependently increased lipase levels by 9 to 55% and subcutaneous semaglutide by 36%.

    “In a 26-week randomized controlled trial, oral semaglutide dose-dependently increased lipase levels by 9 to 55% and subcutaneous semaglutide by 36% (38).”

    From Safety of Semaglutide (2021) · cites this paper as [38]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davies, M., Pieber, T. R., Hartoft-Nielsen, M.-L., Hansen, O. K. H., Jabbour, S., & Rosenstock, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • Medical University of Graz (AT)
  • Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark
  • Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK)
  • Thomas Jefferson University (US)
  • Dallas Diabetes Research Center (US)
Corresponding author
Davies, Melanie
Venue
JAMA
Published
2017-10-17
Volume
318
Issue
15
Pages
1460
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2766836053
Cited by
506
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 3
FWCI
36.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Medicine Forum (submittedVersion)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
semaglutide, oral semaglutide, type 2 diabetes, glycemic control, HbA1c, GLP-1 receptor agonists, dose escalation, body weight, metformin, adverse events, drug safety, placebo comparison, weight loss, cardiovascular risk factors
MeSH terms
Semaglutide, Administration, Oral, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Glucagon-Like Peptides, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Injections, Subcutaneous, Male, Middle Aged, Nausea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review