Cited by 209Diabetes Treatment and ManagementHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Semaglutide (SUSTAIN and PIONEER) reduces cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes across varying cardiovascular risk

Open access
Husain, Mansoor, Bain, Stephen C., Jeppesen, Ole K., Lingvay, Ildiko, Sørrig, Rasmus, Treppendahl, Marianne B., Vilsbøll, Tina·2020·Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the effects of semaglutide versus comparators on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: cardiovascular [CV] death, nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI] and nonfatal stroke) and hospitalization for heart failure (HF) in the SUSTAIN (subcutaneous semaglutide) and PIONEER (oral semaglutide) trials across subgroups of varying CV risk. Methods: Post hoc analyses of individual patient‐level data combined from SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6 were performed to assess MACE and HF. MACE were analysed in subjects with and without: established CV disease and/or chronic kidney disease; prior MI or stroke; and prior HF. MACE in the SUSTAIN and PIONEER glycaemic efficacy trials were also assessed. Results: In SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6 combined, the hazard ratio (HR) for effect of semaglutide versus placebo on overall MACE was 0.76 (95% CI 0.62, 0.92), which was mainly driven by the effect on nonfatal stroke (HR 0.65 [95% CI 0.43, 0.97]). The HR for hospitalization for HF was 1.03 (95% CI 0.75, 1.40). The HRs for MACE were <1.0 in all subgroups, except for those with prior HF (HR 1.06 [95% CI 0.72, 1.57]); P ‐values for interaction of subgroup on treatment effect were >0.05, except for HF (0.046). In the combined glycaemic efficacy trials, the HR for effect of semaglutide versus comparators on MACE was 0.85 (95% CI 0.55, 1.33). Conclusions: In SUSTAIN and PIONEER combined, glucagon‐like peptide‐1 analogue semaglutide showed consistent effects on MACE versus comparators across varying CV risk. No effect of semaglutide on MACE was observed in subjects with prior HF.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dom.13955

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The semaglutide CVOTs did not show an increased incidence of hospitalization for heart failure compared to placebo.

    “the semaglutide CVOTs did not show an increased incidence of hospitalization for HF compared to placebo”

    From Safety of Semaglutide (2021) · cites this paper as [101]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [22]Kaku K, Yamada Y, Watada H, et al. Safety and efficacy of once‐weekly semaglutide versus additional oral antidiabetic drugs, in Japanese subjects with inadequately controlled T2D: a randomised trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018; 20: 1202‐ 1212. 29322610 PMC5969242
  2. [37]Verma S, Poulter NR, Bhatt DL, et al. Effects of liraglutide on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with or without history of myocardial infarction or stroke. Circulation. 2018; 138: 2884‐ 2894. 30566004

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Husain, M., Bain, S. C., Jeppesen, O. K., Lingvay, I., Sørrig, R., Treppendahl, M. B., & Vilsbøll, T.
Affiliations
  • Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research (CA)
  • Swansea University (GB)
  • Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Husain, Mansoor
Venue
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-02-05
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
442-451
ISSN
  • 1462-8902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-1326
OpenAlex
W2998275298
Cited by
209
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 22
FWCI
22.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen (SDCC 3.F CMP)
  • Novo Nordisk
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
semaglutide, type 2 diabetes, major adverse cardiovascular events, heart failure hospitalization, GLP-1 receptor agonists, old myocardial infarction, stroke history, chronic kidney disease, SUSTAIN 6, Pioneer 6, subgroup analysis
MeSH terms
Heart Disease Risk Factors, Semaglutide, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glucagon-Like Peptides, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review