Cited by 549Cancer survivorship and careLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Two-Year Survival Comparing Web-Based Symptom Monitoring vs Routine Surveillance Following Treatment for Lung Cancer

Open access
Denis, Fabrice, Basch, Ethan, Septans, Anne-Lise, Bennouna, Jaafar, Urban, Thierry, Dueck, Amylou C., Letellier, Christophe·2019·JAMA

Abstract

This study reports 2-year survival outcomes among patients with advanced nonprogressive stage IIA to IV lung cancer randomized to symptom monitoring during chemotherapy via web-based patient-reported outcomes vs standard scheduled imaging after treatment to detect symptomatic recurrence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2018.18085

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The SYMPRO-Lung study showed improved 2-year survival for patients with lung cancer monitored with web-based symptom tools.

    “the SYMPRO-Lung study showed improved 2-year survival for patients with lung cancer monitored with web-based symptom tools [6].”

    From Implementing UK Oncology Nursing Society–Informed Digital Symptom Triage With Episode-Based Review in Routine NHS Acute Oncology: Service Evaluation (2026) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Results and Discussion in our copy (labeled Abstract; page unavailable) report improved survival after two years of web-based symptom monitoring for patients with lung cancer. The copy identifies the tool as the Sentinel PRO system but does not identify the trial as SYMPRO-Lung, so that study name is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Denis, F., Basch, E., Septans, A.-L., Bennouna, J., Urban, T., Dueck, A. C., & Letellier, C.
Affiliations
  • Centre Jean Bernard (FR)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Weprom, Angers, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers (FR)
  • Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
  • Normandie Université–CORIA, Rouen, France
Corresponding author
Denis, Fabrice
Venue
JAMA
Published
2019-01-22
Volume
321
Issue
3
Pages
306
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2914579361
Cited by
549
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 106 · 2021: 96 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 21
FWCI
30.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • AstraZeneca
  • National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
lung cancer, patient-reported outcomes, post-treatment surveillance, recurrence detection, two-year survival, chemotherapy
MeSH terms
Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Population Surveillance, Internet, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Self Report, Diagnostic Self Evaluation, Symptom Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review