Cited by 98Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Home monitoring in interstitial lung diseases

Open access
Wijsenbeek, Marlies S, Moor, Catharina C, Johannson, Kerri A, Jackson, Peter D, Khor, Yet H, Kondoh, Yasuhiro, Rajan, Sujeet K, Tabaj, Gabriela C +5 more·2023·The Lancet Respiratory Medicine

Abstract

The widespread use of smartphones and the internet has enabled self-monitoring and more hybrid-care models. The COVID-19 pandemic has further accelerated remote monitoring, including in the heterogenous and often vulnerable group of patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). Home monitoring in ILD has the potential to improve access to specialist care, reduce the burden on health-care systems, improve quality of life for patients, identify acute and chronic disease worsening, guide treatment decisions, and simplify clinical trials. Home spirometry has been used in ILD for several years and studies with other devices (such as pulse oximeters, activity trackers, and cough monitors) have emerged. At the same time, challenges have surfaced, including technical, analytical, and implementational issues. In this Series paper, we provide an overview of experiences with home monitoring in ILD, address the challenges and limitations for both care and research, and provide future perspectives. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2213-2600(22)00228-4

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wijsenbeek, M. S., Moor, C. C., Johannson, K. A., Jackson, P. D., Khor, Y. H., Kondoh, Y., Rajan, S. K., Tabaj, G. C., Varela, B. E., van der Wal, P., van Zyl-Smit, R. N., Kreuter, M., & Maher, T. M.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • Austin Health (AU)
  • Tosei General Hospital (JP)
  • Bombay Hospital (IN)
  • Hospital Alemán (AR)
  • University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Venue
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
97-110
ISSN
2213-2600 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4301366342
Cited by
98
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 2
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Respiratory Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Erasmus Medisch Centrum
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
interstitial lung disease, home monitoring, remote monitoring, home spirometry, smartphone health monitoring, hybrid care, COVID-19 pandemic, patient-reported outcomes, wearable activity trackers, pulse oximetry, cough monitoring, clinical trials, healthcare burden
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Humans, Oxygen, Quality of Life, Lung Diseases, Interstitial, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review