Cited by 52Renin-Angiotensin System StudiesCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research

Renin-Angiotensin System Modulation With Synthetic Angiotensin (1-7) and Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor–Biased Ligand in Adults With COVID-19: Two Randomized Clinical Trials

Open access
Self, Wesley H., Shotwell, Matthew S., Gibbs, Kevin W., de Wit, Marjolein, Files, D. Clark, Harkins, Michelle, Hudock, Kristin M., Merck, Lisa H. +205 more·2023·JAMA

Abstract

Importance: Preclinical models suggest dysregulation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection may increase the relative activity of angiotensin II compared with angiotensin (1-7) and may be an important contributor to COVID-19 pathophysiology. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of RAS modulation using 2 investigational RAS agents, TXA-127 (synthetic angiotensin [1-7]) and TRV-027 (an angiotensin II type 1 receptor-biased ligand), that are hypothesized to potentiate the action of angiotensin (1-7) and mitigate the action of the angiotensin II. Design, Setting, and Participants: Two randomized clinical trials including adults hospitalized with acute COVID-19 and new-onset hypoxemia were conducted at 35 sites in the US between July 22, 2021, and April 20, 2022; last follow-up visit: July 26, 2022. Interventions: A 0.5-mg/kg intravenous infusion of TXA-127 once daily for 5 days or placebo. A 12-mg/h continuous intravenous infusion of TRV-027 for 5 days or placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was oxygen-free days, an ordinal outcome that classifies a patient's status at day 28 based on mortality and duration of supplemental oxygen use; an adjusted odds ratio (OR) greater than 1.0 indicated superiority of the RAS agent vs placebo. A key secondary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. Safety outcomes included allergic reaction, new kidney replacement therapy, and hypotension. Results: Both trials met prespecified early stopping criteria for a low probability of efficacy. Of 343 patients in the TXA-127 trial (226 [65.9%] aged 31-64 years, 200 [58.3%] men, 225 [65.6%] White, and 274 [79.9%] not Hispanic), 170 received TXA-127 and 173 received placebo. Of 290 patients in the TRV-027 trial (199 [68.6%] aged 31-64 years, 168 [57.9%] men, 195 [67.2%] White, and 225 [77.6%] not Hispanic), 145 received TRV-027 and 145 received placebo. Compared with placebo, both TXA-127 (unadjusted mean difference, -2.3 [95% CrI, -4.8 to 0.2]; adjusted OR, 0.88 [95% CrI, 0.59 to 1.30]) and TRV-027 (unadjusted mean difference, -2.4 [95% CrI, -5.1 to 0.3]; adjusted OR, 0.74 [95% CrI, 0.48 to 1.13]) resulted in no difference in oxygen-free days. In the TXA-127 trial, 28-day all-cause mortality occurred in 22 of 163 patients (13.5%) in the TXA-127 group vs 22 of 166 patients (13.3%) in the placebo group (adjusted OR, 0.83 [95% CrI, 0.41 to 1.66]). In the TRV-027 trial, 28-day all-cause mortality occurred in 29 of 141 patients (20.6%) in the TRV-027 group vs 18 of 140 patients (12.9%) in the placebo group (adjusted OR, 1.52 [95% CrI, 0.75 to 3.08]). The frequency of the safety outcomes was similar with either TXA-127 or TRV-027 vs placebo. Conclusions and Relevance: In adults with severe COVID-19, RAS modulation (TXA-127 or TRV-027) did not improve oxygen-free days vs placebo. These results do not support the hypotheses that pharmacological interventions that selectively block the angiotensin II type 1 receptor or increase angiotensin (1-7) improve outcomes for patients with severe COVID-19. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04924660.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2023.3546

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Self, W. H., Shotwell, M. S., Gibbs, K. W., de Wit, M., Files, D. C., Harkins, M., Hudock, K. M., Merck, L. H., Moskowitz, A., Apodaca, K. D., Barksdale, A., Safdar, B., Javaheri, A., Sturek, J. M., Schrager, H., Iovine, N., Tiffany, B., Douglas, I. S., Levitt, J., Busse, L. W., Ginde, A. A., Brown, S. M., Hager, D. N., Boyle, K., Duggal, A., Khan, A., Lanspa, M., Chen, P., Puskarich, M., Vonderhaar, D., Venkateshaiah, L., Gentile, N., Rosenberg, Y., Troendle, J., Bistran-Hall, A. J., DeClercq, J., Lavieri, R., Joly, M. M., Orr, M., Pulley, J., Rice, T. W., Schildcrout, J. S., Semler, M. W., Wang, L., Bernard, G. R., Collins, S. P., ACTIV-4 Host Tissue Investigators, Becker, R. C., del Zoppo, G., Henke, P., Holubkov, R., Johnson, M., Kerr, K., Lipman, H. I., Lurie, F., Pitt, B., Vesely, S. K., Fleg, J. L., Aamodt, D., Ayers, J., Clark, D., Collins, J., Cook, M., Dixon, S., Graves, J., Jordan, C., Lindsell, C. J., Lopez, I., McKeel, D., Orozco, D., Prato, N., Qi, A., Qutab, M., Stoughton, C., Vermillion, K., Walsh, K., Winchell, S., Young, T., Franklin, R., Wagner, E., Walther, T., Demitrack, M., Johnson, J., Walsh, R., Bales, B., Miller, K., Torr, D., Barot, H., Landreth, L., LaRose, M., Parks, L., Teixeira, J. P., Cardenas, S., Ceniceros, J. A., Cunningham, A. G., Kunkel, S., Lovato, D. M., Zimmerman, B., Nguyen, T., Zeger, W., Nichols, H., Wiedel, N., Javaheri, A., Stilinovic, S., Brokowski, C., Lu, J., Solberg, M., Lee, D., Roach, K., Tiffany, B., Tanner, C., Taylor, A., Zumbahl, J., Syed, A., Mason, J., Jackson, P. E. H., Coleman, R. W., Haughey, H. M., Cherabuddi, K., James, N., Wakeman, R., Duncan, C., Montero, C., Rogers, A. J., Wilson, J. G., Vojnik, R., Perez, C., Wyles, D., Hiller, T. D., Oakes, J. L., Garcia, A. Z., Gong, M., Mohamed, A., Andrea, L., Nair, R., Nkemdirim, W., Lopez, B., Boujid, S., Torres, M., Garcia, O., Martinez, F., Baduashvili, A., Bastman, J., Chauhan, L., Douin, D. J., Finck, L., Licursi, A., ten Lohuis, C., Zhang, S., Bender, W., Tovar, S., Hayes, S., Kurtzman, N., Rosseto, E., Scaffidi, D., Shapiro, N., Pak, J., Allada, G., Briceno, G., Peña, J., Oh, M., Ali, H., Beselman, S., Eby, Y., Klimov, V., Hite, R. D., Tanzeem, H., Droege, C., Winter, J., Jackman, S., Caudill, A., Bayoumi, E., Pascual, E., Chen, P.-E., Mucha, S., Thiruchelvam, N., Siuba, M., Mehkri, O., Driver, B. E., Hendrickson, A. F., Kaus, O. R., Ontiveros, C., Riehm, A., Laudun, S., Hudock, D., Ensley, C., Shaner, V., Gentile, N., Isenberg, D., Reimer, H., Cincola, P., Harris, E. S., Callahan, S. J., Yamane, M. B., Barrios, M. A., Desai, N., Bharara, A., Keller, M., Majumder, P., Dohe, C., D’Armiento, J., Goldklang, M., Wagener, G., Fonseca, L., Valezquez-Sanchez, I., Johnson, N. J., Petersen, E., Fuentes, M., Newton, M., Gundel, S., Srinivasan, V., Steel, T., & Robinson, B.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • Department of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • Montefiore Medical Center (US)
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Newton Wellesley Hospital (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Denver Health Medical Center (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
  • Intermountain Medical Center (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Ochsner Medical Center (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic Akron General (US)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (US)
  • Association Clinique et Thérapeutique Infantile du Val de Marne (FR)
  • for the ACTIV-4 Host Tissue Investigators
Corresponding author
Self, Wesley H.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2023-04-11
Volume
329
Issue
14
Pages
1170
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W4364352018
Cited by
52
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11
FWCI
10.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (COVID-19, UL1TR002243, UL1TR001863)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (OT2HL156812)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS113393)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Renin-Angiotensin System Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Keywords
renin-angiotensin system, angiotensin-(1-7), angiotensin II type 1 receptor, biased ligands, COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, 28-day mortality, hospitalized adults, drug safety
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Angiotensin I, Angiotensin II, Angiotensins, Hypoxia, Female, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous, Ligands, Male, Middle Aged, Oligopeptides, Peptide Fragments, Renin-Angiotensin System, Vasodilator Agents, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Receptor, Angiotensin, Type 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review