Cited by 54COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchRenin-Angiotensin System Studies

Seven days treatment with the angiotensin II type 2 receptor agonist C21 in hospitalized COVID-19 patients; a placebo-controlled randomised multi-centre double-blind phase 2 trial

Open access
Tornling, Göran, Batta, Rohit, Porter, Joanna C., Williams, Bryan, Bengtsson, Thomas, Parmar, Kartikeya, Kashiva, Reema, Hallberg, Anders +4 more·2021·EClinicalMedicine

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 morbidity and mortality remains high and the need for safe and effective drugs continues despite vaccines. METHODS: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre, randomised, parallel group phase 2 trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of oral angiotensin II type 2 receptor agonist C21 in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and CRP ≥ 50-150 mg/L conducted at eight sites in India (NCT04452435). Patients were randomly assigned 100 mg C21 bid or placebo for 7 days in addition to standard of care. Primary endpoint: reduction in CRP. The study period was 21 July to 13 October 2020. FINDINGS: 106 patients were randomised and included in the analysis (51 C21, 55 placebo). There was no significant group difference in reduction of CRP, 81% and 78% in the C21 and placebo groups, respectively, with a treatment effect ratio of 0.85 [90% CI 0.57, 1.26]. In a secondary analysis in patients requiring supplemental oxygen at randomisation, CRP was reduced in the C21 group compared to placebo. At the end of the 7-day treatment, 37 (72.5%) and 30 (54.5%) of the patients did not require supplemental oxygen in the C21 and placebo group, respectively (OR 2.20 [90% CI 1.12, 4.41]). A post hoc analysis showed that at day 14, the proportion of patients not requiring supplemental oxygen was 98% and 80% in the C21 group compared to placebo (OR 12.5 [90% CI 2.9, 126]). Fewer patients required mechanical ventilation (one C21 patient; four placebo patients), and C21 was associated with a numerical reduction in the mortality rate (one vs three in the C21 and placebo group, respectively). Treatment with C21 was safe and well tolerated. INTERPRETATION: Among hospitalised patients with COVID-19 receiving C21 for 7 days there was no reduction in CRP compared to placebo. However, a post-hoc analysis indicated a marked reduction of requirement for oxygen at day 14. The day 14 results from this study justify further evaluation in a Phase 3 study and such a trial is currently underway. FUNDING: Vicore Pharma AB and LifeArc, UK.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101152

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tornling, G., Batta, R., Porter, J. C., Williams, B., Bengtsson, T., Parmar, K., Kashiva, R., Hallberg, A., Cohrt, A. K., Westergaard, K., Dalsgaard, C.-J., & Raud, J.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Vicore Pharma (Sweden) (SE)
  • University College Hospital (GB)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB)
  • B.J. Medical College (IN)
  • Noble Hospital (IN)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
Dalsgaard, Carl-Johan
Venue
EClinicalMedicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
41
Pages
101152
ISSN
2589-5370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3209312055
Cited by
54
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EClinicalMedicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • UCLH Biomedical Research Centre
  • LifeArc
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Renin-Angiotensin System Studies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, C21, angiotensin II type 2 receptor agonist, hospitalized patients, C-reactive protein, supplemental oxygen requirement, mechanical ventilation, mortality, drug safety and tolerability, cytokine storm, SARS-CoV-2, post hoc analysis, South Asia, Europe, North America, Africa, Middle East

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review