Cited by 195Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AIArtificial Intelligence Applications

AI, Health, and Health Care Today and Tomorrow: The JAMA Summit Report on Artificial Intelligence

Angus, Derek C., Khera, Rohan, Lieu, Tracy, Liu, Vincent, Ahmad, Faraz S., Anderson, Brian, Bhavani, Sivasubramanium V., Bindman, Andrew +54 more·2025·JAMA

Abstract

Importance Artificial intelligence (AI) is changing health and health care on an unprecedented scale. Though the potential benefits are massive, so are the risks. The JAMA Summit on AI discussed how health and health care AI should be developed, evaluated, regulated, disseminated, and monitored. Observations Health and health care AI is wide-ranging, including clinical tools (eg, sepsis alerts or diabetic retinopathy screening software), technologies used by individuals with health concerns (eg, mobile health apps), tools used by health care systems to improve business operations (eg, revenue cycle management or scheduling), and hybrid tools supporting both business operations (eg, documentation and billing) and clinical activities (eg, suggesting diagnoses or treatment plans). Many AI tools are already widely adopted, especially for medical imaging, mobile health, health care business operations, and hybrid functions like scribing outpatient visits. All these tools can have important health effects (good or bad), but these effects are often not quantified because evaluations are extremely challenging or not required, in part because many are outside the US Food and Drug Administration's regulatory oversight. A major challenge in evaluation is that a tool's effects are highly dependent on the human-computer interface, user training, and setting in which the tool is used. Numerous efforts lay out standards for the responsible use of AI, but most focus on monitoring for safety…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2025.18490

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Angus, D. C., Khera, R., Lieu, T., Liu, V., Ahmad, F. S., Anderson, B., Bhavani, S. V., Bindman, A., Brennan, T., Celi, L. A., Chen, F., Cohen, I. G., Denniston, A., Desai, S., Embí, P., Faisal, A., Ferryman, K., Gerhart, J., Gross, M., Hernandez-Boussard, T., Howell, M., Johnson, K., Lee, K., Liu, X., Lomis, K., London, A. J., Longhurst, C. A., Mandl, K. D., McGlynn, E., Mello, M. M., Munoz, F., Ohno-Machado, L., Ouyang, D., Perlis, R., Phillips, A., Rhew, D., Ross, J. S., Saria, S., Schwamm, L., Seymour, C. W., Shah, N. H., Shah, R., Singh, K., Solomon, M., Spates, K., Spector-Bagdady, K., Wang, T., Gichoya, J. W., Weinstein, J., Wiens, J., Bibbins-Domingo, K., AI, J. S. O., Alterovitz, G., Clancy, H. A., Dawson, L., Diamond, M., Holve, E. C., Kahn, J., Pengetnze, Y. M., Rao, S., Shrank, W. H., & Termulo, C.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Clinton Health Access Initiative (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • American Medical Association (US)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Epic Systems (United States) (US)
  • Stanford University, Stanford, California
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Microsoft (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • University of California, San Diego Health
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • San Ysidro Health (US)
  • Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Apple (United States) (US)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Sutter Health (US)
  • Joint Commission (US)
  • University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
  • Health Care and Organizational Economist, Palo Alto, California
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Editor in Chief, JAMA and the JAMA Network, Chicago, Illinois
  • for the JAMA Summit on AI
Corresponding author
Angus, Derek C.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2025-11-11
Volume
334
Issue
18
Pages
1650
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W4415107779
Cited by
195
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 181 · 2025: 14
FWCI
46.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL175626)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
artificial intelligence in healthcare, AI evaluation, AI regulation, multi-stakeholder engagement, AI equity, mobile health apps, diagnostic imaging, clinical decision support, AI certification, health data infrastructure, health policy incentives, FDA regulation, healthcare delivery efficiency, user training
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Congresses as Topic, Delivery of Health Care, Health Policy, Humans, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, User-Computer Interface, Telemedicine, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review