The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical Use of Bone Densitometry: Scientific Review
Abstract
CONTEXT: Osteoporosis causes substantial morbidity and costs $13.8 billion annually in the United States. Measurement of bone mass by densitometry is a primary part of diagnosing osteoporosis and deciding a preventive treatment course. Bone mineral densitometry has become more widely available and commonly used in practice. OBJECTIVE: To review evidence about the value of various clinical applications of bone densitometry. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search was performed to update previous meta-analyses of the relationship between various measurements of bone density and risk of vertebral and hip fracture. We used data from the prospective Study of Osteoporotic Fractures to estimate risk of fracture from bone density and age in postmenopausal women. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: When available, meta-analyses and systematic reviews are emphasized in the review. DATA SYNTHESIS: Bone mineral density (BMD) predicts fracture and can be used in combination with age to estimate absolute risk of fractures in postmenopausal white women. Hip BMD predicts hip fracture more strongly than other measurements of BMD. There are insufficient data to translate BMD results into risk of fracture for men and nonwhite women. The benefits of treatments to prevent fractures depend on BMD: women with osteoporosis have a greater risk of fractures and greater benefit from treatments than women without osteoporosis. CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines based on systematic reviews and a cost-effectiveness analysis have suggested that it is worthwhile to measure BMD in white women older than 65 years and perhaps to use risk factors to select younger postmenopausal women for densitometry. Other potential clinical applications of BMD that have not yet been adequately studied include screening men or nonwhite women, monitoring BMD in patients receiving treatment, and using BMD to identify patients who should be evaluated for secondary causes of osteoporosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Writing Group for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators (2002) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.288.3.321 · Cited by 15,889
Risk Factors for Hip Fracture in White Women
Cummings, S. R., Nevitt, M. C., Browner, W. S., Stone, K., Fox, K. M., Ensrud, K. E., Cauley, J., Black, D., & Vogt, T. M. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199503233321202 · Cited by 3,595
Self-citationBone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures
Cummings, S. R., Browner, W., Cummings, S. R., Black, D. M., Nevitt, M. C., Browner, W., Genant, H. K., Cauley, J., Ensrud, K., Scott, J., et al. (1993) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)92555-8 · Cited by 2,446
Self-citationCummings, S. R. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.24.2077 · Cited by 2,277
Self-citationEffect of Risedronate on the Risk of Hip Fracture in Elderly Women
McClung, M. R., Geusens, P., Miller, P. D., Zippel, H., Bensen, W. G., Roux, C., Adami, S., Fogelman, I., Diamond, T., Eastell, R., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200102013440503 · Cited by 1,918
Chesnut, C. H., Silverman, S., Andriano, K., Genant, H., Gimona, A., Harris, S., Kiel, D., LeBoff, M., Maricic, M., Miller, P., et al. (2000) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00490-3 · Cited by 1,122
Pre-Existing Fractures and Bone Mass Predict Vertebral Fracture Incidence in Women
Ross, P. D., Davis, J. W., Epstein, R. S., & Wasnich, R. D. (1991) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-114-11-919 · Cited by 1,107
Age-related reductions in the strength of the femur tested in a fall-loading configuration.
Courtney, A. C., Wachtel, E. F., Myers, E. R., & Hayes, W. C. (1995) · The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/00004623-199503000-00008 · Cited by 301
Cited by
Osteoporosis: now and the future
Rachner, T. D., Khosla, S., & Hofbauer, L. C. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62349-5 · Cited by 2,696
Ten Years' Experience with Alendronate for Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women
Bone, H. G., Hosking, D., Devogelaer, J.-P., Tucci, J. R., Emkey, R. D., Tonino, R. P., Rodriguez-Portales, J. A., Downs, R. W., Gupta, J., Santora, A. C., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa030897 · Cited by 1,347
Sarcopenia with limited mobility: an international consensus
Morley, J. E., Abbatecola, A. M., Argiles, J. M., Baracos, V., Bauer, J., Bhasin, S., Cederholm, T., Stewart Coats, A. J., Cummings, S. R., Evans, W. J., et al. (2011) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2011.04.014 · Cited by 1,125
Self-citationEngelke, K., Adams, J. E., Armbrecht, G., Augat, P., Bogado, C. E., Bouxsein, M. L., Felsenberg, D., Ito, M., Prevrhal, S., Hans, D. B., et al. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Densitometry · doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2007.12.010 · Cited by 617
Lønning, P. E., Geisler, J., Krag, L. E., Erikstein, B., Bremnes, Y., Hagen, A. I., Schlichting, E., Lien, E. A., Øfjord, E. S., Paolini, J., et al. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.07.097 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Cummings, S. R., Bates, D., & Black, D. M.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2002-10-16
- Volume
- 288
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1889
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2141528524
- Cited by
- 817
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 38.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
