The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Incidence and Preventability of Adverse Drug Events Among Older Persons in the Ambulatory Setting
Abstract
CONTEXT: Adverse drug events, especially those that may be preventable, are among the most serious concerns about medication use in older persons cared for in the ambulatory clinical setting. OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence and preventability of adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory clinical setting. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Cohort study of all Medicare enrollees (30 397 person-years of observation) cared for by a multispecialty group practice during a 12-month study period (July 1, 1999, through June 30, 2000), in which possible drug-related incidents occurring in the ambulatory clinical setting were detected using multiple methods, including reports from health care providers; review of hospital discharge summaries; review of emergency department notes; computer-generated signals; automated free-text review of electronic clinic notes; and review of administrative incident reports concerning medication errors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of adverse drug events, severity of the events (classified as significant, serious, life-threatening, or fatal), and whether the events were preventable. RESULTS: There were 1523 identified adverse drug events, of which 27.6% (421) were considered preventable. The overall rate of adverse drug events was 50.1 per 1000 person-years, with a rate of 13.8 preventable adverse drug events per 1000 person-years. Of the adverse drug events, 578 (38.0%) were categorized as serious, life-threatening, or fatal; 244 (42.2%) of these more severe events were deemed preventable compared with 177 (18.7%) of the 945 significant adverse drug events. Errors associated with preventable adverse drug events occurred most often at the stages of prescribing (n = 246, 58.4%) and monitoring (n = 256, 60.8%), and errors involving patient adherence (n = 89, 21.1%) also were common. Cardiovascular medications (24.5%), followed by diuretics (22.1%), nonopioid analgesics (15.4%), hypoglycemics (10.9%), and anticoagulants (10.2%) were the most common medication categories associated with preventable adverse drug events. Electrolyte/renal (26.6%), gastrointestinal tract (21.1%), hemorrhagic (15.9%), metabolic/endocrine (13.8%), and neuropsychiatric (8.6%) events were the most common types of preventable adverse drug events. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse drug events are common and often preventable among older persons in the ambulatory clinical setting. More serious adverse drug events are more likely to be preventable. Prevention strategies should target the prescribing and monitoring stages of pharmaceutical care. Interventions focused on improving patient adherence with prescribed regimens and monitoring of prescribed medications also may be beneficial.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Incidence of Adverse Drug Events and Potential Adverse Drug Events: Implications for Prevention
Bates, D. W. (1995) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03530010043033 · Cited by 2,127
Self-citationBates, D. W. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.15.1311 · Cited by 2,107
Self-citationKaufman, D. W., Kelly, J. P., Rosenberg, L., Anderson, T. E., & Mitchell, A. A. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.3.337 · Cited by 1,845
Relationship between medication errors and adverse drug events
Bates, D. W., Boyle, D. L., Vliet, M. B. V., Schneider, J., & Leape, L. (1995) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf02600255 · Cited by 981
Self-citationMatchar, D. B., Samsa, G. P., Cohen, S. J., Oddone, E. Z., & Jurgelski, A. E. (2002) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01131-2 · Cited by 141 · cited 1×
“While more widespread use of specialized clinics for anticoagulation therapy to provide coordinated care has been promoted to improve the effectiveness and safety of warfarin in elderly patients,(30) to date the benefits of this approach relative to usual care have not been established.(31) While most antibiotic-assoc…”
Background
Cited by
Boyd, C. M., Darer, J., Boult, C., Fried, L. P., Boult, L., & Wu, A. W. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.294.6.716 · Cited by 2,581
The American Geriatrics Society 2012 Beers Criteria Update Expert Panel (2012) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03923.x · Cited by 2,578
Medication Adherence: Its Importance in Cardiovascular Outcomes
Ho, P. M., Bryson, C. L., & Rumsfeld, J. S. (2009) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.108.768986 · Cited by 1,488
Vogeli, C., Shields, A. E., Lee, T. A., Gibson, T. B., Marder, W. D., Weiss, K. B., & Blumenthal, D. (2007) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0322-1 · Cited by 1,150
Gage, B. F., Yan, Y., Milligan, P. E., Waterman, A. D., Culverhouse, R., Rich, M. W., & Radford, M. J. (2006) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2005.04.017 · Cited by 1,008
Metadata
- Authors
- Gurwitz, J. H., Field, T. S., Harrold, L. R., Rothschild, J., Debellis, K., Seger, A. C., Cadoret, C., Fish, L. S., Garber, L., Kelleher, M., & Bates, D. W.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2003-03-05
- Volume
- 289
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1107
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2105814725
- Cited by
- 1,676
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 44.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence and Preventability of Adverse Drug Events Among Older Persons in the Ambulatory Setting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.289.9.1107
- The paper
- Gurwitz, J. H., Field, T. S., Harrold, L. R., Rothschild, J., Debellis, K., Seger, A. C., Cadoret, C., Fish, L. S., Garber, L., Kelleher, M., & Bates, D. W. (2003). Incidence and Preventability of Adverse Drug Events Among Older Persons in the Ambulatory Setting. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.9.1107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.