The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chronic Pain and Poor Self-rated Health
Abstract
CONTEXT: Chronic pain is common in Western societies. Self-rated health is an important indicator of morbidity and mortality, but little is known about the relation between chronic pain and self-rated health in the general population. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the association between chronic pain and self-rated health. DESIGN, SETTING, AND POPULATION: A questionnaire survey carried out during the spring of 2002 of an age- and sex-stratified population sample of 6500 individuals in Finland aged 15 to 74 years, with a response rate of 71% (N = 4542) after exclusion of those with unobtainable data (n = 38). Chronic pain was defined as pain with a duration of at least 3 months and was graded by frequency: (1) at most once a week; (2) several times a week; and (3) daily or continuously. On the basis of a 5-item questionnaire on self-rated health, individuals were classified as having good, moderate, or poor health. Multinominal logistic regression analysis was used to assess the determinants of health. Analysis included sex, age, education, working status, chronic diseases, and mood. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perceived chronic pain graded by frequency and self-rated health status. RESULTS: The prevalence of any chronic pain was 35.1%; that of daily chronic pain, 14.3%. The prevalence of moderate self-rated health was 26.6% and of poor health, 7.6%. For moderate self-rated health among individuals having chronic pain at most once a week compared with individuals having no chronic pain, the adjusted odds were 1.36 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.76); several times a week, 2.41 (95% CI, 1.94-3.00); and daily, 3.69 (95% CI, 2.97-4.59). Odds for poor self-rated health were as follows: having chronic pain at most once a week, 1.16 (95% CI, 0.65-2.07); several times a week, 2.62 (95% CI, 1.76-3.90); and daily, 11.82 (95% CI, 8.67-16.10). CONCLUSION: Chronic pain is independently related to low self-rated health in the general population.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It is of great relevance to primary care that chronic pain is also associated with significant increase in morbidity and mortality [11, 12], with 20–50 % of chronic pain sufferers having co-morbid depression [9, 13, 14•].”
From Identification and Management of Chronic Pain in Primary Care: a Review (2016) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“Consultations on pain account for 22 % of all primary care consultations [12], and pain is one of the main reasons for patients seeking contact with healthcare [18].”
From Identification and Management of Chronic Pain in Primary Care: a Review (2016) · cites this paper as [12]
Citations
Cites
Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies.
Idler, E. L., & Benyamini, Y. (1997) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2955359 · Cited by 8,598
Persistent Pain and Well-being: A World Health Organization Study in Primary Care
Gureje, O., Von Korff, M., Simon, G. E., & Gater, R. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.2.147 · Cited by 1,496
The epidemiology of chronic pain in the community
Elliott, A. M., Smith, B. H., Penny, K. I., Smith, W. C., & Chambers, W. A. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)03057-3 · Cited by 1,191
Chronic pain in Australia: a prevalence study.
Blyth, F. M., March, L. M., Brnabic, A. J. M., Jorm, L. R., Williamson, M., & Cousins, M. J. (2001) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00355-9 · Cited by 1,096
Chronic pain-associated depression: Antecedent or consequence of chronic pain? A review
Fishbain, D. A., Cutler, R., Rosomoff, H. L., & Rosomoff, R. S. (1997) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/00002508-199706000-00006 · Cited by 1,074
An Overview of the Incidences and Costs of Low Back Pain
Frymoyer, J. W., & Cats‐Baril, W. L. (1991) · Orthopedic Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0030-5898(20)31652-7 · Cited by 923
A cost-of-illness study of back pain in The Netherlands
van Tulder, M. W., Koes, B. W., & Bouter, L. M. (1995) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(94)00272-g · Cited by 760
Prevalence of chronic benign pain disorder among adults: a review of the literature
Verhaak, P. F. M., Kerssens, J. J., Dekker, J., Sorbi, M. J., & Bensing, J. M. (1998) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(98)00117-1 · Cited by 743
Using Chronic Pain to Predict Depressive Morbidity in the General Population
Ohayon, M. M., & Schatzberg, A. F. (2003) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.60.1.39 · Cited by 617
The prevalence of pain complaints in a general population
Crook, J., Rideout, E. M., & Browne, G. B. (1984) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(84)90824-8 · Cited by 590
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Salk, R. H., Hyde, J. S., & Abramson, L. Y. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000102 · Cited by 2,622
“Gender Differences in Depression in Representative National Samples: Meta-Analyses of Diagnoses and Symptoms Rachel H. Salk University of Wisconsin – Madison and University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Janet S. Hyde and Lyn Y. Abramson University of Wisconsin – Madison In 2 meta-analyses on gender differences in d…”
InfluentialWhat is self-rated health and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model
Jylhä, M. (2009) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.013 · Cited by 2,578
The relationship between self-rated health and objective health status: a population-based study
Wu, S., Wang, R., Zhao, Y., Ma, X., Wu, M., Yan, X., & He, J. (2013) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-320 · Cited by 779
Suicidality in chronic pain: a review of the prevalence, risk factors and psychological links
TANG, N. K. Y., & CRANE, C. (2006) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291705006859 · Cited by 639
Bair, M. J., Wu, J., Damush, T. M., Sutherland, J. M., & Kroenke, K. (2008) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/psy.0b013e318185c510 · Cited by 572
Metadata
- Authors
- Mäntyselkä, P. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Eastern Finland (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Mäntyselkä, Pekka T.
- ORCID
- Mäntyselkä, Pekka T.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2003-11-12
- Volume
- 290
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 2435
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2080600841
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 7.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Keywords
- chronic pain, self-rated health, health perception, pain frequency, prevalence of chronic pain, general population, health status
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Female, Finland, Health Status, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Surveys and Questionnaires
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review